No, pp, it's ultimately the children who are the victims of severed bonds with their established primary caregiver.
Anonymous wrote:I think of it this way--if we had the kids in daycare, as we did when our older was a baby/toddler, we would definitely move to a location that allowed him to remain there if at all possible.
Good grief. OP- daycare or nanny years are behind you faster than you think. You need to look beyond your nose.
Your house is one of the biggest financial investments you will make. If you are looking at public schools, buying into a good school system will affect your children 1000X more than changing daycares or nannies once. Your choices in neighborhood, commute, matching your lifestyle (walkability, yard etc) for the next 10-15 years will affect them much more changing daycares or nannies.
Anonymous wrote:I think of it this way--if we had the kids in daycare, as we did when our older was a baby/toddler, we would definitely move to a location that allowed him to remain there if at all possible.
Good grief. OP- daycare or nanny years are behind you faster than you think. You need to look beyond your nose.
Your house is one of the biggest financial investments you will make. If you are looking at public schools, buying into a good school system will affect your children 1000X more than changing daycares or nannies once. Your choices in neighborhood, commute, matching your lifestyle (walkability, yard etc) for the next 10-15 years will affect them much more changing daycares or nannies.
Anonymous wrote:I think of it this way--if we had the kids in daycare, as we did when our older was a baby/toddler, we would definitely move to a location that allowed him to remain there if at all possible.
Good grief. OP- daycare or nanny years are behind you faster than you think. You need to look beyond your nose.
Your house is one of the biggest financial investments you will make. If you are looking at public schools, buying into a good school system will affect your children 1000X more than changing daycares or nannies once. Your choices in neighborhood, commute, matching your lifestyle (walkability, yard etc) for the next 10-15 years will affect them much more changing daycares or nannies.
I think of it this way--if we had the kids in daycare, as we did when our older was a baby/toddler, we would definitely move to a location that allowed him to remain there if at all possible.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you sound like a great MB. I'm sure your nanny appreciates you taking her commute into consideration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous
i don't think you should be making housing decisions (for purchase at least, perhaps renting would be different) based on your nanny's commute. But I certainly think it would be considerate to talk about it with her so you all know what to plan for and/or what to worry about.
This is great advice.
Anonymous wrote:Find out from her what the maximum commute she'd be willing to make is, and/or if a change in compensation/perks would stretch it at all. Really push her to be realistic about how much she can tolerate.
Then, as you go into the process of looking at homes, you'll already know whether it would allow you to keep her or not. It won't be anything you'll need to consider or factor in consciously, it will just be one piece of data you'll be looking at along with many, many other (more important) pieces.
Anonymous wrote:No, pp, it's ultimately the children who are the victims of severed bonds with their established primary caregiver.