Anonymous wrote:
$24 hour = at least $52,000/year. DH doesn't even make that. That is a LOT of freaking money. I think you PPs are nanny trolls.
Yes, it is a lot of money, but a NAEYC accredited daycare in metro DC would cost close to $6K/month for three children. In this case, $52K for a nanny comes out as the better deal. Also, with twins and a toddler, OP needs a very experienced nanny. This is not a job for a newbie.
BTW, we pay our experienced (20 years) nanny $19/hour, for one infant in NW DC. She is legal, on the books, and we pay taxes and worker's comp. You could get a less experienced nanny off the books for less. But, we need legal employment due to our careers. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$24 hour = at least $52,000/year. DH doesn't even make that. That is a LOT of freaking money. I think you PPs are nanny trolls.
You couldn't even afford to have a child let alone a nanny.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$24 hour = at least $52,000/year. DH doesn't even make that. That is a LOT of freaking money. I think you PPs are nanny trolls.
You couldn't even afford to have a child let alone a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:$24 hour = at least $52,000/year. DH doesn't even make that. That is a LOT of freaking money. I think you PPs are nanny trolls.
Anonymous wrote:$24 hour = at least $52,000/year. DH doesn't even make that. That is a LOT of freaking money. I think you PPs are nanny trolls.