Anonymous wrote:Being raised by a family member is in no way comparible to the procession of hired sitters in and out of your child's life so common today. The most unfortunate aspect of your so-called "intense" parenting, is that you seem to want to believe that this is good for your child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think that mentality was more prevalent in the past than it is now.
I think parents are more involved now, even if they do have a nanny.
I agree.
It used to be standard for parents to spend virtually no time playing with their kids. Standard. Not the realm of the rich and disinterested, but common across all socioeconomic lines. Today, parents know how important it is for their kids to build relationships with them through play time, and even busy working parents make an effort to get that bonding time in before bed or on weekends.
While some don't, like the ones mentioned upthread, I don't believe this is typical anymore, nor nearly as common as it was even 30 years ago.
Anonymous wrote:I find it disappointing that nannies with all that resentment are in the business of caring for children. Really, nannies, your judgmental attitudes are really unflattering to you and your profession.
Anonymous wrote:
Most parents do indeed, love their children.
But love is an ACTION word, not just a feeling you have while you're sitting in your downtown office shuffling stacks of papers. The fact that your absentee parenting provides your child with a grandiose lifestyle, does not make up for it.
The more you're away from your child, the less you know "your" child.
The more tired and stressed you are when you DO see your child, the LESS capable you are to be the parent that your child desperately needs, and deserves.
Why do you think more and more rich kids are growing up RAGING, full of anger and resentment?
"But we gave our child everything." Sure, everything money could buy. Everything, except stable and consistant care during the first three to five years of life. Why do you think they're called "the foundation years"?
Usually, (not always) when the early years go poorly (yes, rich kids often have very sad childhoods), you can have a lifetime of trying to "fix" it. Lifelong therapy and "medication". And hope that does the trick, and there won't be any REALLY serious consequences.
You can give this, any kind of pretty label you want. But whatever you call it, it magically, is NEVER correlated to early childhood care/parenting, or lack of.
This is not about a "blame game".
It's about putting some thought into our values and priorities, and asking,
Is this really the best we can do?
bp
Anonymous wrote:My mb works 15 hours a week yet has 2 nannies. It's about 60 hours a week between the both of is. Her and her husband are off weekends and still have FT care. I hardly ever see her holding the babies unless she has to. She just gives orders all day long.