Anonymous wrote:whatever happened to reading a book as entertainment? I'm sorry but if they can play video games then they can read. I grew up in a house with the tv on 24/7 but my mother set a great example with reading. i would get lost in books for hours even at a young age. Take your kids to the library and develop some early literacy or buy them art supplies and tell them to get creative. Parents can have downtime while teaching their children how to entertain themselves in constructive ways. Start young and set clear expectations then you won't have brats driving you nuts or becoming zombies in front of a television.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe ask if they can have a little extra screen time during break so you guys can all play an active game on the Wii or whatever. I totally agree with limited week day/school day screen time, but sometimes video games can be a fun activity for everyone!
Anonymous wrote:OP - what in the world would they be paying you for if you are just there to make sure they are alive and supplied w/ food while they watch TV or play video games? I suppose someone still needs to do that, but certainly not a skilled nanny. DH and I do have a number of kids shows' on the DVR - DD watches 1 hr a day (while we get dressed in the morning and then at night before bed) weekdays and about 2 hrs on weekends. yes, I think the time on weekends is kind of too much - i'm not proud - but it is just too much to come off the work week and be up at 6 bright and early and ready to engage w/ the kiddos. If you are a nanny w/ your own kids, you get to decide what happens with their screen time on the days of the week YOU do not work and you are trying to squeeze in a small bit of relaxing.
I would say the outing issue is the problem. Make a list of some suggested spots (know the pricing and hours) and ask MB which are OK for times when there is no school for an extended period. Or ask if it would be OK for the kids to invite over a friend for a couple hours (yes, it's extra kids in the house but since it sounds like they are school age, I think it would be LESS work for you since the kids would then play together so long as each has a friend).
Anonymous wrote:It's something I could suggest, but when I say things off hand about how much they have to keep them in a lot of screen time and always ask for more, they ignore it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember that working parents essentially do your job when there not doing their actual job. So all that downtime you get in the weekends and evenings to relax, do your laundry, cook dinner, do the shopping and errands? Parents don't get that.
You say this thinking that all nannies do not have their own families and children... There are quite a few that DO and they actually interact with their kids on the weekends. They also work all week long (usually longer hours than the parents you are talking about) and might have much more physical jobs than a parent that works in an office building. Just because you work all week, doesn't mean that you can't be involved with your kids on the weekends. Some tv/screen time is fine, but to use the excuse that they had to work all week is just weak. They could easily promote other activities that the kids don't even need the parents for, or help with crafts etc that don't involve them running around so they can sit and relax while doing something with the kids. I didn't really "play" much at all with my parents, but there were always many things to do and tv or computer time was only a small percent of my day.
Anonymous wrote:But I think you lose your argument when you argue that if the parents let their kids watch TV all weekend, that its hypocritical that they won't pay someone to plop their kids in front of the TV all week too.
Anonymous wrote:Remember that working parents essentially do your job when there not doing their actual job. So all that downtime you get in the weekends and evenings to relax, do your laundry, cook dinner, do the shopping and errands? Parents don't get that.