Anonymous wrote:As someone who has learned the hard way (our younger nanny getting involved with my brother-in-law), I will never again hire someone under the age of 40 to work in my house. Why risk the temptation?
Anonymous wrote:It is foolish to assume an older person has low energy levels and that a younger person is guaranteed to be energetic. There are lazy 20-something nannies and 65-year-old nannies who could run laps around them.
If energy is your concern, you should speak to each candidate's references about that.
Younger nanny is not as domestic. She won't look around the house and know this this this needs to be done. Not saying she shouldn't get a break but one thing about our younger nanny is that she is totally oblivious to housework. She didn't even know how to make simple children's meals and I had to show her. It is ok but just expect that she is not a mom, more like someone to make sure your kids are safe and entertained. Older people are more mom-like and may be more sympathetic/understanding to all the "running of the house" work you have to do in addition to your work and raising kids.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with others that it isn't a hard and fast rule that older is better than younger or vice versa. From your description, I would probably go with the older nanny since she had been with her family for 12 years. This would indicate that she is flexible, willing to do new new things to be remain valuable and able handle kids at multiple ages. I do think that you should ask more infant care philosophy questions as she may be set in her old ways and you may be set in your new ways.
I would not select the 22 year old nanny based on your description. While I do like younger nannies, 18-22 is too young for an infant and they logistically can not have much experience. In fact this age group is so inexperienced that they think that their babysitting experience in high school or helping out with relatives actually counts. I would hire a young nanny who is 24 and has at least 2 years of full time experience with an infant. Her answer about why she isn't teaching also sounds like BS. She is 22, exactly how much experience teaching could she have had to decide it wasn't fulfilling enough? She is most likely unable to find a teaching position or is frustrated that working in a daycare or preschool is hard work. You can never get on your phone, decide to meet up with other people, go to activities outside planned field trips, run your own errands, or enjoy many of the flexibilities that being a nanny over being a childcare teacher offers. These positions also pay very little so she is hoping to increase her income by 50% while doing less work.
If you prefer a younger nanny, I would keep looking.
Anonymous wrote:LOOK YOUNGER NANNY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE 22YEARS I WOULD NOT LEAVE MY KIDS WITH SOMEONE THAT YOUNG. WHEN YOU ARE AT WORK YOU WANT TO MAKE SHURE YOUR HOME IS SAFE ALSO PEOPLE ARE NOT RUNING IN AND OUT. YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT EVERY THING, NOT JUST THE AGE I WOULD GO WITH THE OLDER NANNY FOR PEACE OF MINE