You sound crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wroteon't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.


I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

It's too bad you can't imagine it, because if you could, you'd stand a far greater chance of landing a good job.Employers don't want a nanny who thinks it's a good idea to bring her kid. It isn't, and a nanny who thinks otherwise is selfish and unprofessional. This is what we think, nannies. The only MBs who will consider this are ones who want to save money by participating in a nanny share.

You are most welcome to speak for yourself.

My experience is that there are MBs (especially of singletons) who are happy to have a nanny bring her child, and NOT pay reduced rates. This arrangement is CERTAINLY (for SW) not for everyone.

These MBs are a tiny minority.

What's an SW?

Who cares?
Only one MB like that was all I was interested in. I was even placed by one of the top agencies into that amazing position. I loved that job and they loved my child. We kind of all adopted each other.

SW is that shyster woman who wants to shut down people she doesn't like. I guess she gets away with that in her job, but it doesn't work so well here. She's an entitled control freak. No one here is afraid of her. Tisk-tisk-tisk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wroteon't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.


I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

It's too bad you can't imagine it, because if you could, you'd stand a far greater chance of landing a good job.Employers don't want a nanny who thinks it's a good idea to bring her kid. It isn't, and a nanny who thinks otherwise is selfish and unprofessional. This is what we think, nannies. The only MBs who will consider this are ones who want to save money by participating in a nanny share.

You are most welcome to speak for yourself.

My experience is that there are MBs (especially of singletons) who are happy to have a nanny bring her child, and NOT pay reduced rates. This arrangement is CERTAINLY (for SW) not for everyone.

These MBs are a tiny minority.

What's an SW?

Anonymous wrote:

You are most welcome to speak for yourself.

My experience is that there are MBs (especially of singletons) who are happy to have a nanny bring her child, and NOT pay reduced rates. This arrangement is CERTAINLY (for SW) not for everyone.

We all know about your opinion, PP. You hijack every thread to share it. You've already been told on other threads that we wish you'd knock it off and leave.

Important for you to remember your own words. You only speak for yourself. And, you aren't an MB, so your sole opinion isn't worth much.

I do always speak only for myself, unlike you SW, based on my education and experiences in the field. And you?
Btw, you have absolutely no idea as to the scope of my various roles, so don't play "pretend".
GL with trying to shut down everyone you don't like. This is not a good arena for that type of entitlement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wroteon't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.


I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

It's too bad you can't imagine it, because if you could, you'd stand a far greater chance of landing a good job.Employers don't want a nanny who thinks it's a good idea to bring her kid. It isn't, and a nanny who thinks otherwise is selfish and unprofessional. This is what we think, nannies. The only MBs who will consider this are ones who want to save money by participating in a nanny share.

Pp it's fine for you to say what your opinion and experiences are but you really don't speak for everyone. Contrary to your belief these views are not universal.

You are most welcome to speak for yourself.

My experience is that there are MBs (especially of singletons) who are happy to have a nanny bring her child, and NOT pay reduced rates. This arrangement is CERTAINLY (for SW) not for everyone.

We all know about your opinion, PP. You hijack every thread to share it. You've already been told on other threads that we wish you'd knock it off and leave.

Important for you to remember your own words. You only speak for yourself. And, you aren't an MB, so your sole opinion isn't worth much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wroteon't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.


I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

It's too bad you can't imagine it, because if you could, you'd stand a far greater chance of landing a good job.Employers don't want a nanny who thinks it's a good idea to bring her kid. It isn't, and a nanny who thinks otherwise is selfish and unprofessional. This is what we think, nannies. The only MBs who will consider this are ones who want to save money by participating in a nanny share.

You are most welcome to speak for yourself.

My experience is that there are MBs (especially of singletons) who are happy to have a nanny bring her child, and NOT pay reduced rates. This arrangement is CERTAINLY (for SW) not for everyone.

Anonymous wroteon't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.


I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

It's too bad you can't imagine it, because if you could, you'd stand a far greater chance of landing a good job.Employers don't want a nanny who thinks it's a good idea to bring her kid. It isn't, and a nanny who thinks otherwise is selfish and unprofessional. This is what we think, nannies. The only MBs who will consider this are ones who want to save money by participating in a nanny share.

A true professional understands the critical importance of establishing and maintaining the newborn bond between the mother and the newborn infant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.

I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

When you can find care for 30 hours a week, and pay a decent nanny to care for your child for $14/hr while you work for a higher paying family (due to more experience and schooling), where you can earn $22/hr, then why not? When you can have 6 hour days instead of 8-10 hour long ones, and can spend that extra time with your own child plus be earning almost a 1/3 more than what you are paying your nanny? Why not?

How many people leave their kids with a nanny? How many people don't want to give up their own jobs when they have a child, even if they could get by easily without it? Do you tell teachers that they should just stay home with their kids, as they are going to work with other people's children as well? Maybe everyone should just stay home with their own kids? Maybe that chef who works at the restaurant you like should stay home and cook his own family dinner instead of having the mom or nanny do it? I can't believe he would go and cook someone else their dinner and not cook dinner for his own family!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:12:24- My you have lots of empty time on your hands to do all that unpaid research. Your opinions need not match other opinions here. Did you think otherwise?

12:30, please just stop. PP defended herself from your accusation of putting words in your mouth by showing you which of your quotes she was responding to. You may either stop responding, elaborate on those quotes, or acknowledge your mistake, but we are ALL - nanny and MB alike - tired of your constant badgering of other posters. You have some good points to make, you just need to learn how to make them. Changing the topic every time someone points out you're wrong is not the way to do it.

+10000. I really wish the nanny poster at issue would just disappear from this board. She hijacks every thread with badgering and ruins the experience for everyone else, MB and nannies alike.

Come on now. No one has that much power.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:12:24- My you have lots of empty time on your hands to do all that unpaid research. Your opinions need not match other opinions here. Did you think otherwise?

12:30, please just stop. PP defended herself from your accusation of putting words in your mouth by showing you which of your quotes she was responding to. You may either stop responding, elaborate on those quotes, or acknowledge your mistake, but we are ALL - nanny and MB alike - tired of your constant badgering of other posters. You have some good points to make, you just need to learn how to make them. Changing the topic every time someone points out you're wrong is not the way to do it.

+10000. I really wish the nanny poster at issue would just disappear from this board. She hijacks every thread with badgering and ruins the experience for everyone else, MB and nannies alike.

Anonymous wrote:Don't try to bring you baby. You will find many more available positions.

I can't imagine a nanny leaving behind her own newborn to take care of someone else's kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wrong? Based on what? Your difference of opinion?

Do you admit that these quotes came from you?

Not all of the quotes came from the looney PP. One of them is mine (about the only children I know) and while I maintain my opinion, I am not the PP you have been arguing with.

13:23 isn't half as smart as she thought she was and she's boring.

MEOW hissss

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wrong? Based on what? Your difference of opinion?

Do you admit that these quotes came from you?

Not all of the quotes came from the looney PP. One of them is mine (about the only children I know) and while I maintain my opinion, I am not the PP you have been arguing with.

13:23 isn't half as smart as she thought she was and she's boring.