Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have a nanny, and I do think you did a few things wrong, from my perspective. People have different philosophies of childrearing, so perhaps this one is just not a good fit. But in my house, the adults set the schedule, not the toddlers. If I say my son should go out to the park at 10am, I expect the nanny to take him to the park at 10am. That means not asking "are you ready to go to the park?" but instead saying "okay, it's time to go to the park. Let's find your shoes!"
Also - I think you meant to say that he's allowed to watch cartoons while he finishes breakfast. Most parents (myself included) limit screens. So if a parents says that a kid is allowed to watch cartoons when he finishes breakfast, that's a few minutes. Maybe 20 minutes, max, then you need to cut off the screens. You let him sit on screens for over two hours! That's an excessively long period of time.
Finally, three year olds need naps, or at a minimum, rest or quiet time, in the afternoon. That's fairly universal. So, no, going to the park after lunch is not an option.
Toddlers and preschoolers thrive on routine and structure. It sounds like this family had a pretty typical routine for their three year old, and you didn't respect it. Flexibility can be valuable, but letting a like sit on screens for 2 hours while I'm paying is not flexibility - it's laziness.
The temp thing is a bit more of a judgement call if she's in the house. It's your first day, it's not like 64 degrees is going to kill him, and I think many work from home parents prefer that nannies handle things rather than bothering them, so I would be fine with a nanny powering through on a cold temperature and then bringing it up later "it seems like the temperature in the house was a bit cool this morning. Is that your preferred temperature? I can just bring a sweater if so." But yeah, you should have at least felt his arm and if it felt cold, gotten him a sweater.
Why should he go at 10 am if he doesn't want to? You are too controlling.
I mean, okay. You're welcome to your opinion. But it just lost you a nanny gig. I'm sure there are some parents who are happy to pay someone $27 an hour to watch their 3 year olds watch screens all morning, then go to the park instead of napping because they want to. But most aren't, so you're going to struggle to find a nannying position.
In case your question was earnest instead of snarky:
1) Screens are literally addicting
2) Just about every expert agrees that screens should be limited for children - the Mayo Clinic says no more than one hour a day:
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/childrens-health/in-depth/screen-time/art-20047952
3) Playing outside is beneficial to children for learning gross and fine motor skills.
4) The child will likely be able to socialize with other children at the playground, another area for learning.
5) A child who spent the morning on screens is likely to be wound up, not nap, and be a terror the rest of the day. A child who spent the morning at the park is likely to take a good nap and be well regulated the rest of the day.
6) Toddlers and preschoolers thrive on structure and routine. This is particularly true when big things in his life are changing (like getting a new nanny!)
7) A three year old can't make intelligent choices about how to structure his day. It's not "controlling" to do what's best for a toddler, which is why good nannies keep their charges on a schedule.
8) Parents may want to save a kid's limited screen time for moments when they really need it - like getting ready for work or making dinner, and don't want to waste it when there's literally someone there you're paying to entertain your child.
9) If I'm paying you $27 an hour, you do what I say. I love our nanny, and I take feedback from her, make adjustments, and ask for and take her advice regularly. But at the end of the day I am the parent, and if I want the kids at the park at 10, guess what? The kids go to the park at 10.