Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are wrong.
Stipend at $200 per week - $10,500
Agency fee (first year; second year$1300 lower) - $9300.
That leaves 5-8k for food and perks.
You must be a nanny. You had no clue.
No, your agency charges much cheaper fees, you must be with a bottom barrel agency. Ours charges 12k. Our stipend 12k. Car insurance is 2k. Educational stipend is 1k. Food, gas, perks is easily 8k. So yes, 35-40 is about right.
Anonymous wrote:You are wrong.
Stipend at $200 per week - $10,500
Agency fee (first year; second year$1300 lower) - $9300.
That leaves 5-8k for food and perks.
You must be a nanny. You had no clue.
Anonymous wrote:
Yup, and then you invest in the relationship and they decide they can no longer deal with certain aspects of the job (even though you were 100% transparent) and then they leave you high and dry.
Anonymous wrote:No way 38k for an AP unless you are lying double the stipend and other perks.
25–28k is about right. And I pay more than the min stipend
Anonymous wrote:Agree with the PP. Same as nanny share, less than nanny. But the relationship is a very different one. An au pair is not your employee. You are taking in a young woman into your family. She is there for family traditions, you are there for her when she is sick, homesick, or heartbroken. It takes a lot of mental energy to integrate your au pair and to get to know a complete stranger, who from one day to the next will be sitting at your dinner table. You also get a lot in return. We enjoy the energy that these young women bring into our house. We love watching them mature during the year that they spend with us. But if you are not interested in this exchange, you are setting yourself (and your au pair) up for failure. We have had four au pairs and we are having a nanny now. So I know the difference. The money is one part of it, but there is much more to it than money.