Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't it illegal to fire a woman for begin pregnant? Where are all the Women's March-ers in this?? Hypocrites!
Haven't you noticed that "women's rights" are for only for rich uppity women? If you take CARE of THEIR children, you deserve ZERO rights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You tell them whenever you can afford to get fired - without notice.
What an ignorant thing to say.
Anonymous wrote:I am 20:38.
"Begin" of course should be "being."
I am a middle class white woman in my 50s who marched for the ERA in front of the White House. I began reading Ms. magazine at age 13. I escorted girls and women into abortion clinics while being threatened by anti-choicers. I am a dedicated feminist.
Frankly I have had it with the liberal upper/ middle class/ rich women of this country, of any color. None of them seem remotely interested in raising their own children, and treating their nannies and au pairs as lowly servants instead of sisters in the continuing march for equal legal and economic rights.
I agree with everything the OP said except that only-children are missing out.
Anonymous wrote:Isn't it illegal to fire a woman for begin pregnant? Where are all the Women's March-ers in this?? Hypocrites!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ds' nanny told us around 10 weeks. She hadn't planned on it but was really struggling with morning sickness and felt she had to tell us before we thought something was wrong.
She went out around 36 weeks and was out for 2.5 months. 1 month paid extra and 2 of her vacation weeks. So about half the time she got paid. Came back after with her baby as DS was starting AM preschool anyways. So in the morning she hung out with her baby and did some stuff around the house. When her kid was about 8 months old her mom moved close to them and took the baby in the afternoons.
Has worked out well. I know she plans to have another one and we do as well. Ds will be in full day school in the fall so hopefully it will work out well again. Haha I am secretly hoping we can have babies around the same time because logistics would be so, so easy
That’s amazing- glad it worked out for you and her! Hopefully babies #2 comes at the same time.
Anonymous wrote:You tell them whenever you can afford to get fired - without notice.
Anonymous wrote:Ds' nanny told us around 10 weeks. She hadn't planned on it but was really struggling with morning sickness and felt she had to tell us before we thought something was wrong.
She went out around 36 weeks and was out for 2.5 months. 1 month paid extra and 2 of her vacation weeks. So about half the time she got paid. Came back after with her baby as DS was starting AM preschool anyways. So in the morning she hung out with her baby and did some stuff around the house. When her kid was about 8 months old her mom moved close to them and took the baby in the afternoons.
Has worked out well. I know she plans to have another one and we do as well. Ds will be in full day school in the fall so hopefully it will work out well again. Haha I am secretly hoping we can have babies around the same time because logistics would be so, so easy
Anonymous wrote:How early do you tell them? I wouldn’t ask to bring my child but if they brung it up, I would consider it. I don’t want to put that type of pressure on anyone but I’m not exactly sure if I would continue to commute as I would be missing my babies whole day; I leave at 6am and don’t get home until 7:30pm.