Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you paid OT? Bet not. These are unrealistic work conditions and you need to find another position with no more than 45 hours a week.
Do you read before making assumptions? Bet not. Why always assume the worst on situations, especially those you are completely unfamiliar with?
OP, do you want to continue working 60 hour weeks? Do you need more paid time off? Two weeks is not very much.
Anonymous wrote:Are you paid OT? Bet not. These are unrealistic work conditions and you need to find another position with no more than 45 hours a week.
Anonymous wrote:I think you are doing everything right, but where you are going to get blow back is that you're leaving them out of it.
You need to bring them into the process rather than presenting them with your new schedule + a sitter as a fait accompli. This is what will make an employer feel like s/he is being told how to manage her household and possibly lead to anger.
I suggest asking for a meeting where you tell them how much you love being your nanny kids' nanny, but after however long you've been working there, you have reached the end of your ability to work the long hours. Then present them with your plan.
They may come back to you with a different option, and that is something you will have to consider. If they, for example, offer to get someone to cover all evenings from 4:30 on, for example, or to take over Fridays entirely, cutting your overtime considerably, would you be ok with that? Because if I were presented with the need to get a second nanny, that is what I would do -- exchange the hassle and expense of another employee for less OT cost and a job with enough hours to be attractive to a candidate.
Anonymous wrote:I think you are doing everything right, but where you are going to get blow back is that you're leaving them out of it.
You need to bring them into the process rather than presenting them with your new schedule + a sitter as a fait accompli. This is what will make an employer feel like s/he is being told how to manage her household and possibly lead to anger.
I suggest asking for a meeting where you tell them how much you love being your nanny kids' nanny, but after however long you've been working there, you have reached the end of your ability to work the long hours. Then present them with your plan.
They may come back to you with a different option, and that is something you will have to consider. If they, for example, offer to get someone to cover all evenings from 4:30 on, for example, or to take over Fridays entirely, cutting your overtime considerably, would you be ok with that? Because if I were presented with the need to get a second nanny, that is what I would do -- exchange the hassle and expense of another employee for less OT cost and a job with enough hours to be attractive to a candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Just trying to get a sense of whether this crosses a line.
I work 60+ hours per week with 2 under 4 (4 13-hour days and 1 8-hour day). I have two weeks’ paid time off that gets taken up with visiting family and other similar obligations. I am getting really burnt out because I can never do literally anything Monday-Thursday. I have enrolled in the NAEYC annual conference in DC and plan to take a few unpaid days off then. I also said yes to a few other commitments that would require me to leave qork by 6:30 instead of 8:30. I plan to do the work of finding and training a qualified replacement sitter and my OT rate is so high that even paying generous wages for a sitter they are still getting a discount on those hours. I obviously need to ask permission but I am trying to figure out how much blowback I might get.