02:39 sounds like a complete dick. There was no reason to come at this post like a raging asshole.
Anonymous wrote:1. You had no business letting her sleep in and skip math when parents had given explicit directions, unless you have the authority to override parental directives (you don’t) or called for permission (you didn’t).
First of all, we don’t know that Op was the one to let her sleep in. If that was the case, then that is wrong. Regarding the math, Op stated they just didn’t have the time. Perhaps from now on the parents would prefer their child going to school late instead.
Anonymous wrote:2. How do you know the math is both age- and individual-inappropriate? I tutor as well as nannying, and most kids are either above or below grade level for in at least one subject. If you are supposed to be helping with supplements to bring her to grade level (or class level if she’s in an accelerated program?), she may struggle. Not your business. If you have concerns, raise them to the parents or quit.
Op was just making an observation that the child seems to be struggling too hard. They literally just added that as a quick side note and immediately said it was none of their business. Again, you’re just a dick.
Anonymous wrote:3. Parents should never denigrate an employer to a child as children are incapable of recognizing biases and form incomplete biases. However, mom was mad because you threw her directions out the window, and she used the situation to reinforce that her priority for her child should also be the child’s priority. It’s also possible that the child overheard parents talking, child questioned mom and mom spun the words in as positive a way as she could without saying she was lying before.
You should have left this after the first sentence, as it’s the only thing that’s not bullshit.
There should be no
however. Don’t justify the mother’s actions. How can the parents expect their child to respect the person caring for her if she’s not seeing her parents do the same?
Children need to respect their caregivers, because if they see their parents doing the opposite, you can bet there’s going to be a plethora of issues. The child is definitely not going to be listening or behaving for that caretaker if they’ve been taught this person deserves no respect.
This actually also ties in with your #4, where you said:
Anonymous wrote:4. You are between jobs, this isn’t your career. What level of respect did you expect? You aren’t even tutoring the child, she’s just doing a few math problems with you. While I typically side with nannies who are under appreciated, this seems more like you heard a hard truth.
I’m sorry? What level of respect should Op expect? How about the level of respect a person caring for your child in
any capacity should expect? How about the level of respect that any decent human being deserves?
Your logic is that since Op’s not doing the one thing they’re going to be doing forever, that deems them undeserving of any respect. So that means every high-schooler and college kid working at a Starbucks deserves to be treated like they don’t matter. To be fair, I think a lot of people have your messed up mentality, so at least you’re not alone.
Anonymous wrote:5. As soon as the child stated that mom checked the answer, you should have dropped it and then either written or emailed mom. The note should have explained that you thought you noticed an error, and daughter said she did it with mom, so you were leaving it for mom to check with daughter, if she decided to do so.
6. You absolutely should not have argued with a child about whether her mother made a mistake or was good at math!!! You shouldn’t have gotten into the whole discussion at all!
I’m sorry, is this person’s job to help the child with math or not? She did the right thing by trying to show the kid the right way to do it. Op said, “Hey, let’s check this answer, everyone makes mistakes!” What exactly is the problem with that? The child is not going to learn if she’s doing the problems wrong.
I think the note/email idea of yours should have come after this discussion they had. Op could say, “I noticed a problem on her worksheet that I think may be done incorrectly. I attempted to walk her through the problem, but she was insistent that you checked it. I just wanted to bring that to your attention in case you’d like to double-check it.”
Op could also take that time to address the disturbing conversation that came after. A conversation that I don’t think Op was wrong for participating in. It’s human nature to be curious and after hearing a child say they do nothing, I’m not surprised Op was intrigued to hear the rest. They deserve to know.
Anonymous wrote:7. You don’t seem to realize that kids at that age elaborate and exaggerate what they hear. They also lie and make up stories, especially if they think it will get them what they want (you gone and mom home for mornings). Logical planning is possible, but they are also prone to emotional outbursts, especially when you do something like insult the child’s mother.
Of course children make up stories! This certainly doesn’t sound like a case of that. I also don’t believe Op insulted the child’s mother. As I said above, Op only said that everyone makes mistakes and they should check it over.
Checking your work and finding mistakes you may have made should also be a part of the learning process. It should also be known that’s its
okay to make mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:8. Stony willed children aren’t a problem, and kids are SUPPOSED to test boundaries! It’s their job! It’s how they learn that the same cause has the same effect every single time! Your job is to make as few rules as necessary, but keep the boundaries firm. Most rules should relate to health and safety, with parental directives filling in the rest. Manners and other social graces aren’t rules, they are things children learn to better navigate through life.
Op literally never said the child was a problem. They actually stated the child’s manner as a fact, and then went on to say they understood the child’s behavior. There was nothing negative in their statement.
Op was concerned mainly about the parents saying bad things, making their job harder because now the child has zero respect for them or their job.
Anonymous wrote:I would suggest finding something else to do, pronto! You don’t seem to understand the basics about this type of position. Good luck finding something better suited to your knowledge and temperament.
I agree with your first statement. Get outta there, Op! This sounds like it’ll only go downhill from here. You’re caring for the most precious thing in their lives and they talk about you like nothing?
I think Op sounds like they were doing their job just fine. It’s the parents who don’t understand the basics of human etiquette.