this is what I was thinking as well. The kid was needy and not what the sitter expected when she agreed to the rate.Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing the older child didn't stay in his room, and instead came down an chatted with the nanny after the younger one was in bed and she wanted to relax.
Anonymous wrote:My next-door neighbor has two boys.
One is ten and her other is fourteen.
The fourteen yr. old has Aspergers & mostly keeps to himself in his room when not in school.
She rarely leaves her kids with a sitter, but had to on Fri. night.
She found a great sitter via Care.com who agreed to watch the ten year old for $16/HR.
Since the fourteen yr. old never leaves his room, my neighbor mentioned that he didn’t need a sitter.
Well when my neighbor arrived home, the sitter told her that since there were two kids in the home, then she had to charge for the extra child even though she wasn’t specifically asked to babysit him since he was “older.”
My neighbor paid the extra money but was peeved at the sitter.
I agree w/the sitter.
Anyone under 18 should be included in the babysitter’s overall rate, while my neighbor thinks the sitter should only have been charging for the younger son since the eldest son didn’t need any hands-on care.
He warmed up his own dinner and entertained himself.
Who is right?
Anonymous wrote:OP Here-My neighbor told the sitter that there were two kids in the home and that the oldest didn’t require a babysitter because he usually kept to himself & warmed up his own dinner.
The sitter was okay with charging for only ONE child, but when my neighbor returned the sitter had changed her mind + said that she HAD to charge for the other child too.
Anonymous wrote:OMG, OP - learn to write in actual paragraphs! Your bullet points are so ridiculous.
Was the babysitter filmed with audio? Now that is what is most important!