Anonymous wrote:I would increase by a few dollars but also lower the other families amount when nanny has all three kids. As a parent of one, I would not be ok with paying 1/2 when you have two kids and I have one.
Anonymous wrote:Hi OP,
Not sure why everyone was so confused by your post. Yes, you need to pay for three children, as there will often be three children (after school, possibly before, school holidays, teacher days, and SUMMERS). Don't break up the pay when she has 2 and when she has 3, that is complicated and doesn't give her a proper budget. Plus, given that the share is at your house, she will likely be tending to laundry of both your children.
I think a $4 raise is sufficient, $3 coming from you and $1 coming the other family when the annual raise approaches.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP - Perhaps I worded that wrong, I realize we would incur the entire cost of the increase, I just wasn't sure what the increase should be and how much the second families portion should decrease. Is there a set percentage people use? Is it all just case by case. I agree it gets complicated fast.
To the PP, unclear why would I pay a full $5 more an hour when we go back to two children. That seems unimaginable to do across the board and unaffordable in the long-term. I love our nanny dearly but I think even she would agree that doesn't make a lot of sense.
There will be days when school is closed, holidays when you work, summer vacations. You pay the extra all the time. This is grossly unfair to the nanny!
Anonymous wrote:If you were going to give her a cumulative raise of a dollar for the work anniversary, I'd bump it up to $2 and cover it yourself. That way the other family gets the benefit of not paying the extra 0.50/hr for the coming year, and you get the stability of the nanny you love and care for both kids.
$4 would be amazing, but feels like a LOT when you consider that most people seek out shares specifically because getting their own nanny is out of reach financially. If you can swing more, pay more, of course. But I think my suggestion is fair to you and the other family and the nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Hi OP,
Not sure why everyone was so confused by your post. Yes, you need to pay for three children, as there will often be three children (after school, possibly before, school holidays, teacher days, and SUMMERS). Don't break up the pay when she has 2 and when she has 3, that is complicated and doesn't give her a proper budget. Plus, given that the share is at your house, she will likely be tending to laundry of both your children.
I think a $4 raise is sufficient, $3 coming from you and $1 coming the other family when the annual raise approaches.