Anonymous wrote:You can honor the intent of the day and recognize that you - though female - are employing your nanny/housekeeper/whatever and effectively she is the support for your economic engine. More likely than not, even if you have to take a vacation day or lose pay - you are in a better financial position than this employee of yours and encouraging her to feel empowered to participate in this nationwide protest would be awesome and the right thing to do as I bet you know in your heart of hearts. Yep - you may 'suffer' an economic impact yourself female or not but isn't the broader point as a woman and as someone trying to support a movement to want as many as possible to participate to make a real societal change? Most posters here don't seem to support the goals but OP you seem like you do. It comes down to how much 'skin' are you personally willing to put in the game - and really - if like most people (myself not included as I am self-employed) you get paid for the day no matter what - you are doubly privileged that you can do good and get paid too. And I would guess that your husband would watch his kids and in turn he would not be there at his job either - spreading the message....
What message? You really think Trump cares about women protesting? At this point, women's issues are not the priority and to me the priority is all the other concerns such as immigration. We have family that live in another country and cannot get a visa to even visit (they have no intention of immigrating). Or, health care. Both are universal issues, not just for women. Its an excuse to take the day off work. If you want to, then go unpaid so an employer can use your salary to pay someone else. A dad (or mom) should not be forced to take off of work for you to protest. For many families, having a nanny is a luxury and a stretch to their budget. Not everyone has a flexible schedule to just take off as their nanny decides to no show. The point of a nanny is so you can work.