Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no reason that, for the right price, a nanny can't do all the tasks that a SAHM would do (including dishes, cooking, laundry etc. just not deep cleaning).
If a SAHM was EITHER just a teacher or housekeeper, they would be a failure.
I only spend the extra cost of getting a nanny because they can do both things- just like me if I were home.
If I simply wanted "teaching" I would go to a daycare where they have all the appropriate age props to help kids develop.
This is my thought. How can a nanny only sit and care for a child when a SAHM does everything. However, not all babies nap and some need extra attention.
Why do stay at home mom's need nanny? Please correct first you are looking for housekeeper not nanny to do all your work loads.
She's (correctly) pointing out that someone can expect a nanny do to all the things in 10 hours that a SAHM does in 10 hours.
Anonymous wrote:Today you have two choices of Nanny: Nanny as housekeeper and Nanny as teacher.
A nanny as teacher will keep your child stimulated and engaged with narration, reading, songs, finger-play (like Itsy Bitsy Spider to develop both sides of the brain) singing, and conversation. While the baby sleeps, the teacher-nanny will do all chores related to the baby - make purees, laundry, sterilizing toys.
A nanny as housekeeper is basically a babysitter who will keep an eye on the baby while the nanny cleans.
Also remember that by law, every domestic employee gets 20 minutes for each five hours worked. That is 40 minutes for the usual ten hour nanny shift.
Your choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no reason that, for the right price, a nanny can't do all the tasks that a SAHM would do (including dishes, cooking, laundry etc. just not deep cleaning).
If a SAHM was EITHER just a teacher or housekeeper, they would be a failure.
I only spend the extra cost of getting a nanny because they can do both things- just like me if I were home.
If I simply wanted "teaching" I would go to a daycare where they have all the appropriate age props to help kids develop.
This is my thought. How can a nanny only sit and care for a child when a SAHM does everything. However, not all babies nap and some need extra attention.
Why do stay at home mom's need nanny? Please correct first you are looking for housekeeper not nanny to do all your work loads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no reason that, for the right price, a nanny can't do all the tasks that a SAHM would do (including dishes, cooking, laundry etc. just not deep cleaning).
If a SAHM was EITHER just a teacher or housekeeper, they would be a failure.
I only spend the extra cost of getting a nanny because they can do both things- just like me if I were home.
If I simply wanted "teaching" I would go to a daycare where they have all the appropriate age props to help kids develop.
This is my thought. How can a nanny only sit and care for a child when a SAHM does everything. However, not all babies nap and some need extra attention.
Why do stay at home mom's need nanny? Please correct first you are looking for housekeeper not nanny to do all your work loads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no reason that, for the right price, a nanny can't do all the tasks that a SAHM would do (including dishes, cooking, laundry etc. just not deep cleaning).
If a SAHM was EITHER just a teacher or housekeeper, they would be a failure.
I only spend the extra cost of getting a nanny because they can do both things- just like me if I were home.
If I simply wanted "teaching" I would go to a daycare where they have all the appropriate age props to help kids develop.
This is my thought. How can a nanny only sit and care for a child when a SAHM does everything. However, not all babies nap and some need extra attention.
Anonymous wrote:There is no reason that, for the right price, a nanny can't do all the tasks that a SAHM would do (including dishes, cooking, laundry etc. just not deep cleaning).
If a SAHM was EITHER just a teacher or housekeeper, they would be a failure.
I only spend the extra cost of getting a nanny because they can do both things- just like me if I were home.
If I simply wanted "teaching" I would go to a daycare where they have all the appropriate age props to help kids develop.
Anonymous wrote:Seriously, how did SAHM's keep the household and kids in good shape before the invention of the dishwasher, washing machine? Kids simply didn't get undivided attention all day- because they don't need it.
As a mom of 4- you can put baby in bouncy seat and let toddlers run around a couple rooms with baby gates, while I or nanny gets house stuff done.
There is no way I'm coming home from my strenuous 10 hour day at work to just spend the rest of the night doing laundry, cooking and running errands. That is my nanny's job- and she's awesome and well paid.