Anonymous wrote:Op here: yes its an apartment, kitchen, bathroom, separate entrance, brand new space. Thanks for the insight, I guess the issue is most nannies would rather not live in and don't care about having a full apartment in DC and would rather live in cheaper areas of the metro. I'll go back to renting to others and just work on finding the best nanny for my son.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the basement sound proof? I assume complete private kitchen and ground level?
Well is nanny wants all the modern conveniences she is more than welcome to work for a different family for $10 an hour and try to rent her own $2000 studio apartment in this part of DC. I'm just trying to help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the basement sound proof? I assume complete private kitchen and ground level?
Well is nanny wants all the modern conveniences she is more than welcome to work for a different family for $10 an hour and try to rent her own $2000 studio apartment in this part of DC. I'm just trying to help.
Anonymous wrote:Is the basement sound proof? I assume complete private kitchen and ground level?
Anonymous wrote:OP here: we live in Petworth. I don't have a need for a live in, its just one child. It sounds like we are better off finding someone who likes the apartment, and then finding someone who wants to be the nanny. I imagine there is someone out there that this would be the perfect fit for, but not many.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with PPs. Live-ins are for people who need a live-in (usually because it's a split schedule or otherwise strange hours that would be really unpleasant to work if you add a commute into the mix). If you don't really need a live-in, then it will make more financial sense to charge someone full price for the apartment and pay a nanny a full wage, because even nannies who will work as a live-in (and many won't) and who will accept a lower hourly rate as a live-in (and many won't) still won't reduce their pay by the full cost of the apartment.