Anonymous wrote:I would ask her which she prefers: lump sum payment for a completed project or OT with her nanny rate as the base.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes they'd be OT hours technically. Think of all the jobs where the employee wears many hats. A secretary for example may soend her morning answering phones, some time cleaning the break room, driving to pickup food for a meeting, fixing the copy machine, etc. Yiu can't parse those out into different jobs.
However, I've cut families a break on this before because I'd rather have the work than they hire someone else at a cheaper rate. This is for if it is something truly outside of nannying, like if I'm hired to cook for a party. I have rates that I charge for that, and that is what I ask families to pay.
I have no good reason to give my employers discounts, nor do they need them.
Anonymous wrote:Yes they'd be OT hours technically. Think of all the jobs where the employee wears many hats. A secretary for example may soend her morning answering phones, some time cleaning the break room, driving to pickup food for a meeting, fixing the copy machine, etc. Yiu can't parse those out into different jobs.
However, I've cut families a break on this before because I'd rather have the work than they hire someone else at a cheaper rate. This is for if it is something truly outside of nannying, like if I'm hired to cook for a party. I have rates that I charge for that, and that is what I ask families to pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Legally, yes, they get overtime. However, also legally, there can be a different pay rate if the job is deemed substantially different. This wouldn't apply for something like nannying and evening babysitting (too close of a job) However, you could set up a gardening rate vs nannying rate or a one vs two child rate. OT is then calculated as a blended average of the actual hours worked at each rate.
Gardeners earn much more then nannies, Einstein, so her blended rate will skyrocket.
The conniving minds of some of you is utterly shameful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Legally, yes, they get overtime. However, also legally, there can be a different pay rate if the job is deemed substantially different. This wouldn't apply for something like nannying and evening babysitting (too close of a job) However, you could set up a gardening rate vs nannying rate or a one vs two child rate. OT is then calculated as a blended average of the actual hours worked at each rate.
Gardeners earn much more then nannies, Einstein, so her blended rate will skyrocket.
The conniving minds of some of you is utterly shameful.
Anonymous wrote:Legally, yes, they get overtime. However, also legally, there can be a different pay rate if the job is deemed substantially different. This wouldn't apply for something like nannying and evening babysitting (too close of a job) However, you could set up a gardening rate vs nannying rate or a one vs two child rate. OT is then calculated as a blended average of the actual hours worked at each rate.