finally someone with a good answer!! If someone at work didn't like your perfume you had on and asked you to stop wearing it or go buy a more expensive kind that didn't bother them, would you? I stopped wearing my sented lotion! I love the baby and don't want her to continue to have a rash. The mom requested me to use the kind that the entire family uses so it's all the same....after my bottle is gone I don't feel like I shouldn't add lotion into my monthly budget (it comes in small bottles and would be gone faster then other stuff). In the winter months I need lotion due to super dry skin...I don't feel like I should be held responsible to pay for something like this.Anonymous wrote:If employer insists on specific product. Employer pays.
Anonymous wrote:If your lotion can be demonstrated to cause a rash (and it sounds that way from what you are describing) then you should not be using that lotion before (or during) work.
Period.
Use your lotion after work. If you need to use a lotion then find something unscented and hypoallergenic.
I think the family can reasonably request that you not use the lotion that is causing a reaction in the baby. I don't think you can require them to supply you with lotion unless you have a medical need that cannot be met in some way.
Anonymous wrote: No. A professional nanny should not be using scented body products when caring for young children and infants. For exactly this reason. Those things often cause allergic reactions in babies and toddlers, and there is some evidence that a lot of those artificial scents can be tied to endocrine disruptors. You should never have been wearing it to work to begin with, so no. The family should not have to provide it for you. If you want to use lotion, find something that is unscented. If the family wants you to use only lotions that are organic or all-natural or something like that, then I could see asking them to pay for it but unscented is something that you should be wearing by default as a nanny.