Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
"Competitive pay" sounds like a worthless hook some parents use in their advertisements, especially when they indicate they want a better than average nanny.
I should say it's more like deceptive.
So if you're an average nanny, you're the one they want.
I'm the one who's been replying with what the definition of competitive is. We all get the same BS. It's not just the childcare industry. Most employers don't advertise the salary range ahead of time. It's not in their interest to do so. I think it's all a huge waste of everyone's time not to be up front about it, but there's nothing unique to the nanny field going on here. "competitive" is a cop out, but if you refuse to apply for jobs that are listed like that, then you're cutting yourself off from most of the market.
Anonymous wrote:
"Competitive pay" sounds like a worthless hook some parents use in their advertisements, especially when they indicate they want a better than average nanny.
I should say it's more like deceptive.
So if you're an average nanny, you're the one they want.
Anonymous wrote:So competitive is your average rate, whatever you think that is?
Anonymous wrote:So if you know you're far above average (and you're used to be compensated accordingly,) don't bother speaking with parents offering "competitive" pay?
In the DC area, average nanny pay is in the $17-20/hour range.
The better nannies can earn $25-30+.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a couple meanings here. The phrase "competitive pay" is what most job postings say when they don't want to disclose the amount upfront, but they want to indicate that they likely could match what you currently make - assuming you're earning market rate.
In pure economic terms, when there is strong competition in a sector - childcare in this instance - then the competition will yield an average, competitive rate. In this area, the published averages are $15-20. If you want higher than average, than perhaps "top dollar" is more the buzz phrase you're looking for.
We know some nannies are 25-30 and more. So when you say average, you mean some are 10-15? That's really not accurate at all for the DC area. Maybe you're looking at care.com, and everyone knows about them.
So when advertisement says, we'd like a great or exceptional nanny, will pay competitively, there's an obvious contradiction, no?
Anonymous wrote:There are a couple meanings here. The phrase "competitive pay" is what most job postings say when they don't want to disclose the amount upfront, but they want to indicate that they likely could match what you currently make - assuming you're earning market rate.
In pure economic terms, when there is strong competition in a sector - childcare in this instance - then the competition will yield an average, competitive rate. In this area, the published averages are $15-20. If you want higher than average, than perhaps "top dollar" is more the buzz phrase you're looking for.