Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then you can't tell the difference between the flu and a bad cold or stomach virus.
Nobody and I mean nobody works with the flu.
Yes, I do. With infants and toddlers, I don't work if my fever is over 100.5, I have thrown up in the past 3 hours or had diarrhea in the last two hours. Otherwise, I work, because my bosses are people that don't have the option of calling in unless it's actually an emergency. With preschoolers and older kids? I work no matter what my symptoms are, because that's what the parents and I agreed. All of my charges are capable of making themselves simple food by 4/5 (peanut butter sandwich, grabbing hummus and cut veg, etc.), they know when I'm sick that we all have an easy day. I do the best I can to not contaminate them, but such is life, and they usually are the ones who were sick first. In one case, we lived 5 miles form school, and there was no busing, so that parents called the school to let them know kiddos wouldn't be in as I couldn't do drop-off or pick-up. Just because you don't work with the flu doesn't mean that others don't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then you can't tell the difference between the flu and a bad cold or stomach virus.
Nobody and I mean nobody works with the flu.
Yes, I do. With infants and toddlers, I don't work if my fever is over 100.5, I have thrown up in the past 3 hours or had diarrhea in the last two hours. Otherwise, I work, because my bosses are people that don't have the option of calling in unless it's actually an emergency. With preschoolers and older kids? I work no matter what my symptoms are, because that's what the parents and I agreed. All of my charges are capable of making themselves simple food by 4/5 (peanut butter sandwich, grabbing hummus and cut veg, etc.), they know when I'm sick that we all have an easy day. I do the best I can to not contaminate them, but such is life, and they usually are the ones who were sick first. In one case, we lived 5 miles form school, and there was no busing, so that parents called the school to let them know kiddos wouldn't be in as I couldn't do drop-off or pick-up. Just because you don't work with the flu doesn't mean that others don't.
Anonymous wrote:Then you can't tell the difference between the flu and a bad cold or stomach virus.
Nobody and I mean nobody works with the flu.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son has RSV. (He's 13 months and this is his second bout.) We are in a nanny share. Before we knew it was RSV, the other family was weary of him being around their child because they didn't want her getting a cold. i understood, so I took him home. Now, for the past four days, I have had to pay my nanny even though I cannot use her, plus pay someone else to help out for a few hours during the day, plus sacrifice several hours of work. On Fridays, we do not do the share and the nanny comes to my house. What is generally appropriate in this situation? Should she come despite the fact that he might be contagious or should she stay home? Also, what do other families who are in nanny shares do when it is the common cold?
One other thing, does anyone else feel like between their child's illnesses, their nanny's illnesses/schedule, and your own schedule that you are constantly having to take time from work? I keep wondering if I have the wrong nanny and the wrong share arrangements.
This is why you pay for your own nanny. Nanny takes care of your child(ren) with no differentiation between sick or well. When nanny has a cold or light flu, she works as normal, only calls off if you don't want your child around her or if she has fever, vomiting or diarrhea. And there's zero reason that your schedule should be making you take off work unless you are sick; find a nanny who will work with your schedule.
You want a nanny with a "light flu" taking care of your baby? You're awful, both toward your nanny and your baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son has RSV. (He's 13 months and this is his second bout.) We are in a nanny share. Before we knew it was RSV, the other family was weary of him being around their child because they didn't want her getting a cold. i understood, so I took him home. Now, for the past four days, I have had to pay my nanny even though I cannot use her, plus pay someone else to help out for a few hours during the day, plus sacrifice several hours of work. On Fridays, we do not do the share and the nanny comes to my house. What is generally appropriate in this situation? Should she come despite the fact that he might be contagious or should she stay home? Also, what do other families who are in nanny shares do when it is the common cold?
One other thing, does anyone else feel like between their child's illnesses, their nanny's illnesses/schedule, and your own schedule that you are constantly having to take time from work? I keep wondering if I have the wrong nanny and the wrong share arrangements.
This is why you pay for your own nanny. Nanny takes care of your child(ren) with no differentiation between sick or well. When nanny has a cold or light flu, she works as normal, only calls off if you don't want your child around her or if she has fever, vomiting or diarrhea. And there's zero reason that your schedule should be making you take off work unless you are sick; find a nanny who will work with your schedule.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son has RSV. (He's 13 months and this is his second bout.) We are in a nanny share. Before we knew it was RSV, the other family was weary of him being around their child because they didn't want her getting a cold. i understood, so I took him home. Now, for the past four days, I have had to pay my nanny even though I cannot use her, plus pay someone else to help out for a few hours during the day, plus sacrifice several hours of work. On Fridays, we do not do the share and the nanny comes to my house. What is generally appropriate in this situation? Should she come despite the fact that he might be contagious or should she stay home? Also, what do other families who are in nanny shares do when it is the common cold?
One other thing, does anyone else feel like between their child's illnesses, their nanny's illnesses/schedule, and your own schedule that you are constantly having to take time from work? I keep wondering if I have the wrong nanny and the wrong share arrangements.
This is why you pay for your own nanny. Nanny takes care of your child(ren) with no differentiation between sick or well. When nanny has a cold or light flu, she works as normal, only calls off if you don't want your child around her or if she has fever, vomiting or diarrhea. And there's zero reason that your schedule should be making you take off work unless you are sick; find a nanny who will work with your schedule.
Anonymous wrote:My son has RSV. (He's 13 months and this is his second bout.) We are in a nanny share. Before we knew it was RSV, the other family was weary of him being around their child because they didn't want her getting a cold. i understood, so I took him home. Now, for the past four days, I have had to pay my nanny even though I cannot use her, plus pay someone else to help out for a few hours during the day, plus sacrifice several hours of work. On Fridays, we do not do the share and the nanny comes to my house. What is generally appropriate in this situation? Should she come despite the fact that he might be contagious or should she stay home? Also, what do other families who are in nanny shares do when it is the common cold?
One other thing, does anyone else feel like between their child's illnesses, their nanny's illnesses/schedule, and your own schedule that you are constantly having to take time from work? I keep wondering if I have the wrong nanny and the wrong share arrangements.