Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I do not know myself personally how a nanny can handle two screaming, hungry, sleepy babies, I do think that the younger a child is, the more the nanny should be financially compensated.
Younger kids need to fed by the nanny as well as changed often.
Even daycares have higher rates for infants vs. toddlers.
That's because the law has a higher ratio of caretakers to children in day care. Until they can go to the bathroom themselves.
So if nannies want to be paid more for infants because they "are more work", do thy get paid less as the infant ages?
How long do you pay a nanny a premium for infants?
Anonymous wrote:While I do not know myself personally how a nanny can handle two screaming, hungry, sleepy babies, I do think that the younger a child is, the more the nanny should be financially compensated.
Younger kids need to fed by the nanny as well as changed often.
Even daycares have higher rates for infants vs. toddlers.
Anonymous wrote:Some people just don't mind a baby crying until you're able to get to him/her. That's why twin/triplet parents prefer to have an extra pair of hands to help.
I really don't recommend shares for babies. If the parents tried to do it, they'd understand after day one.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you want the share to be with another infant vs a toddler? I find it so much easier on everyone when there's an age spread.
Anonymous wrote:you can absolutely find a nanny like this - in my nanny career I have had 4 sets of two infants and never found it to be a problem. sure, there have been rare times when both are crying at once, but that is what happens when you are juggling two infants. I never found it to be a problem and once they hit 6 months old I made sure they were on the same 3 nap a day schedule. finding a nanny experienced with multiples is important - she will likely see two infants as no big deal (which is how I feel). two babies can easily be put down to nap at the same time and fed at the same time.