Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't.
Because in the event that one side breaches it, most likely it will not stand up on a court of law since a judge cannot rule that a person is obligated to provide a service to the other.
Plus, any employment in the U.S. is "at-will."
Except for bakers.
How's that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't.
Because in the event that one side breaches it, most likely it will not stand up on a court of law since a judge cannot rule that a person is obligated to provide a service to the other.
Plus, any employment in the U.S. is "at-will."
Except for bakers.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't.
Because in the event that one side breaches it, most likely it will not stand up on a court of law since a judge cannot rule that a person is obligated to provide a service to the other.
Plus, any employment in the U.S. is "at-will."