Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300
$6/ hour?
If the kids sleep though the night yes I would for 300. As an extra gig to make money why not
I wouldn't hire anyone who values her time so cheaply.
Haha I've never had that problem. Most families state what they will pay and I almost always say yes. Of course I would say yes to 1,000 but i would also say yes to 300
Why would you not want your normal rate during the day?
Because I see it as extra money I wouldn't have had kind of like a gift. My normal rate is very low anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300
$6/ hour?
If the kids sleep though the night yes I would for 300. As an extra gig to make money why not
I wouldn't hire anyone who values her time so cheaply.
Haha I've never had that problem. Most families state what they will pay and I almost always say yes. Of course I would say yes to 1,000 but i would also say yes to 300
Why would you not want your normal rate during the day?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300
$6/ hour?
If the kids sleep though the night yes I would for 300. As an extra gig to make money why not
I wouldn't hire anyone who values her time so cheaply.
Haha I've never had that problem. Most families state what they will pay and I almost always say yes. Of course I would say yes to 1,000 but i would also say yes to 300
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300
$6/ hour?
If the kids sleep though the night yes I would for 300. As an extra gig to make money why not
I wouldn't hire anyone who values her time so cheaply.
Anonymous wrote:17:36 again. I didn't explicitly state this, but thought I should add: yes, if you're talking about over 40 hours than legally overtime must be paid. And if you calculate that nanny is there for 48 hours at $1000 it comes out a regular rate of over $19/hr (19x40=760 + OT rate of $28.50 x 8 hours = $988 total).
So, again, it depends on nannies duties and how many children (and their ages, and if they are differently abled, etc), but $19/hr is a bit on the high end for the care of 1-2 non-infant non-special-needs kids.
AND, there is the fact that when most parents hire an overnight sitter, they generally arrange for a slightly lower rate during the hours the kids will be sleeping, or a slightly lower overall rate given that the nanny herself will also be sleeping on the job. Again, assuming there is not a special needs or infant child who is likely to be up at night, if the kids can be expected to sleep 11 hours each night (approx 8pm-7am?), and even if they don't nap, then the kids will be asleep for about 22 hours out of the 48 that nanny will be there, which is pretty high.
Anyway, again, I think $800 is fair, but $1000 might be better if you have an infant, special needs kids, expect additional chores, or want a highly qualified and experienced nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300
$6/ hour?
If the kids sleep though the night yes I would for 300. As an extra gig to make money why not
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300
$6/ hour?
Anonymous wrote:That's alot I would do it for 300