Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on when you are let go. If you are let go right when you are about to give birth, you are not eligible for unemployment because you have to willing and able to work.
After you get the all clear from your doctor to go back to work you can then file for unemployment then.
Please link to your source, IF you're telling the truth.
The rules are always the same: you have to be actively seeking employment, and you can't put too many restrictions on it (such as, only 3 days a week, 8-4 or something, or, only within a two-block radius of your home).
Unemployment is not disability insurance, which is for when you can't work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on when you are let go. If you are let go right when you are about to give birth, you are not eligible for unemployment because you have to willing and able to work.
After you get the all clear from your doctor to go back to work you can then file for unemployment then.
Please link to your source, IF you're telling the truth.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on when you are let go. If you are let go right when you are about to give birth, you are not eligible for unemployment because you have to willing and able to work.
After you get the all clear from your doctor to go back to work you can then file for unemployment then.
An employer can let an employee go if they are no longer able to perform the duties for which they were hired. So, if you're pregnant and fully able to take care of your charge as you were when hired, fully able to do all the other duties, etc... then you may have a case.
If you are unable to do the required tasks because you are pregnant (cannot lift the child(ren) anymore, cannot be on your feet, are unable to run after a child as necessary, are experiencing significant morning sickness or other things that are affecting your ability to do the job, etc...) then your employer may have a case for firing for cause.
If you're the nanny who is HOPING to be fired for being pregnant, and counting on receiving unemployment as a result, then I wish you would stop bothering us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An employer can let an employee go if they are no longer able to perform the duties for which they were hired. So, if you're pregnant and fully able to take care of your charge as you were when hired, fully able to do all the other duties, etc... then you may have a case.
If you are unable to do the required tasks because you are pregnant (cannot lift the child(ren) anymore, cannot be on your feet, are unable to run after a child as necessary, are experiencing significant morning sickness or other things that are affecting your ability to do the job, etc...) then your employer may have a case for firing for cause.
If you're the nanny who is HOPING to be fired for being pregnant, and counting on receiving unemployment as a result, then I wish you would stop bothering us.
You're our forum troll. We know you.
Anonymous wrote:An employer can let an employee go if they are no longer able to perform the duties for which they were hired. So, if you're pregnant and fully able to take care of your charge as you were when hired, fully able to do all the other duties, etc... then you may have a case.
If you are unable to do the required tasks because you are pregnant (cannot lift the child(ren) anymore, cannot be on your feet, are unable to run after a child as necessary, are experiencing significant morning sickness or other things that are affecting your ability to do the job, etc...) then your employer may have a case for firing for cause.
If you're the nanny who is HOPING to be fired for being pregnant, and counting on receiving unemployment as a result, then I wish you would stop bothering us.
Anonymous wrote:An employer can let an employee go if they are no longer able to perform the duties for which they were hired. So, if you're pregnant and fully able to take care of your charge as you were when hired, fully able to do all the other duties, etc... then you may have a case.
If you are unable to do the required tasks because you are pregnant (cannot lift the child(ren) anymore, cannot be on your feet, are unable to run after a child as necessary, are experiencing significant morning sickness or other things that are affecting your ability to do the job, etc...) then your employer may have a case for firing for cause.
If you're the nanny who is HOPING to be fired for being pregnant, and counting on receiving unemployment as a result, then I wish you would stop bothering us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obviously, being fired for being pregnant is not "for cause". Would I then be eligible for unemployment benefits?
You should see a lawyer and sue the birch. But, yes, you should be able to draw unemployment as long as you are able to work and actively seeking employment. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:Obviously, being fired for being pregnant is not "for cause". Would I then be eligible for unemployment benefits?