Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I'm in a share with 3 children. When family A had their second child I recieved a $4 raise. My situation is slightly different as none of the children are in school, but I can honestly say that raise wasn't enough. Managing three children 3 and under is physically and mentally draining. What makes it more difficult is the fact that I have two families to please and the family with one child is always disappointed that our plans get altered due the baby's nap schedule. I already told them this will be my final year because the position is becoming too stressful and exhausting. Your position sounds sound less stressful since the children will be in school.
I would at minimum give $3 raise, $2 for the added the child that the other family pays and $1 for her yearly raise that you split. Given that she is barely at an average rate for a nanny share, the added yearly raise should keep her happy longer. But personally if I were her, I'd just look for a two child share that pays $20.
The OP feels she isn't underpaying at under $18.
NP here. That's fine for OP to feel that way, but why would any nanny, including hers, take on all this work for the same rate they could easily get in a normal 2 kid share? Market rates do exist, and just as paying above market isn't advised, paying below market is inadvisable if you value stable and quality care for your kids. If I were OPs nanny, I'd be interviewing for an easier position at the same rate. It won't take long for her to realize that she's getting a raw deal.
But OP's nanny isn't taking on all this extra work. Her workload is actually decreasing. Two of the three children will be in preschool, one for the majority of the day. She will, with a $2/hr raise, be making almost $20/hr for a share that has one child for half a day, two children for half a day and a third for a few hours. It's not a raw deal.
But the exhausted PP with the $4/hr raise brings up a good point. Some nannies are not cut out for shares because they can't handle three small children at once. She, and nannies like her, probably should only seek families with one child. More money isn't going to make her better at her job or less exhausted. She needs a new job.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I'm in a share with 3 children. When family A had their second child I recieved a $4 raise. My situation is slightly different as none of the children are in school, but I can honestly say that raise wasn't enough. Managing three children 3 and under is physically and mentally draining. What makes it more difficult is the fact that I have two families to please and the family with one child is always disappointed that our plans get altered due the baby's nap schedule. I already told them this will be my final year because the position is becoming too stressful and exhausting. Your position sounds sound less stressful since the children will be in school.
I would at minimum give $3 raise, $2 for the added the child that the other family pays and $1 for her yearly raise that you split. Given that she is barely at an average rate for a nanny share, the added yearly raise should keep her happy longer. But personally if I were her, I'd just look for a two child share that pays $20.
The OP feels she isn't underpaying at under $18.
NP here. That's fine for OP to feel that way, but why would any nanny, including hers, take on all this work for the same rate they could easily get in a normal 2 kid share? Market rates do exist, and just as paying above market isn't advised, paying below market is inadvisable if you value stable and quality care for your kids. If I were OPs nanny, I'd be interviewing for an easier position at the same rate. It won't take long for her to realize that she's getting a raw deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in a share with 3 children. When family A had their second child I recieved a $4 raise. My situation is slightly different as none of the children are in school, but I can honestly say that raise wasn't enough. Managing three children 3 and under is physically and mentally draining. What makes it more difficult is the fact that I have two families to please and the family with one child is always disappointed that our plans get altered due the baby's nap schedule. I already told them this will be my final year because the position is becoming too stressful and exhausting. Your position sounds sound less stressful since the children will be in school.
I would at minimum give $3 raise, $2 for the added the child that the other family pays and $1 for her yearly raise that you split. Given that she is barely at an average rate for a nanny share, the added yearly raise should keep her happy longer. But personally if I were her, I'd just look for a two child share that pays $20.
The OP feels she isn't underpaying at under $18.
Anonymous wrote:I'm in a share with 3 children. When family A had their second child I recieved a $4 raise. My situation is slightly different as none of the children are in school, but I can honestly say that raise wasn't enough. Managing three children 3 and under is physically and mentally draining. What makes it more difficult is the fact that I have two families to please and the family with one child is always disappointed that our plans get altered due the baby's nap schedule. I already told them this will be my final year because the position is becoming too stressful and exhausting. Your position sounds sound less stressful since the children will be in school.
I would at minimum give $3 raise, $2 for the added the child that the other family pays and $1 for her yearly raise that you split. Given that she is barely at an average rate for a nanny share, the added yearly raise should keep her happy longer. But personally if I were her, I'd just look for a two child share that pays $20.
Anonymous wrote:I would raise the rate by $2/hr with the other family paying the increase. This is an average new child raise and since her work load will decrease with two children in preschool for a significant part of her day, she will be making an above average rate for Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She hasn't said directly if she does or not but has hinted that it wouldn't be an issue for her. She used to watch 4 kids in a 2 family share so I think she would feel fairly comfortable watching 3, especially if one was only home from 2:45pm - 5:30pm on school days. However before we talked to her I wanted to present her with all the facts including salary so she would know what she was committing to from the get go.
I would suggest giving her your older child's expected holiday/vacation schedule, while reminding her of the unexpected sick days. After a conversation with her, follow-up with a written proposal.
Anonymous wrote:She hasn't said directly if she does or not but has hinted that it wouldn't be an issue for her. She used to watch 4 kids in a 2 family share so I think she would feel fairly comfortable watching 3, especially if one was only home from 2:45pm - 5:30pm on school days. However before we talked to her I wanted to present her with all the facts including salary so she would know what she was committing to from the get go.