Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Current position is ending do I am looking for a new one. I went on an interview for a nanny share. I liked them overall but they aren't paying very competitive ( $21/hr for two 12 week old infants). The mothers explained that it will be a weekly salary of $840 for 40 hours a week. They said some weeks I will leave earlier but still get paid and other weeks I will work more but still be paid the same rate. Their thinking was the pay and hours will even out.
Guaranteed hours are off the table and when I brought up OT, they said they wouldn't be paying that. Of course I am not considering this position but I've never heard of such a way to be paid in all my years of exp.
Does this seem odd and practically illegal?
Op here. To me $21/hr is not a lot when you have to care for two infants, change homes every week, handle all baby care, and they want you to handle pet care for both families and some meal prep for both. That seems like a lot. They also don't offer benefits
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are trying to pay a salary, which is not legal, nor is it beneficial to anyone but the employer. It is a terrible idea for a nanny, since you are paid for your time and not for the completion of any task. There is nothing to guarantee that it will all "even out", and many MANY of us have experienced the promises of getting to leave early followed by the reality of frequent late nights/early mornings. Do not even consider this position.
Unfortunately, they will find some poor sucker who will quickly see that $21/hour for 40 hours dwindle down to $15-16 for 50 hours and no overtime.
I have worked with two families who have paid by salary. It actually is not illegal at all. I've worked for an accountant family and an attorney family. My boyfriend is an attorney and he looked over my contracts. Never once was I not paid. I was paid a weekly salary rate ( with OT) and then any additional work I did for the week was paid at my OT rate in cash. This happened with both families. I was happily paid, compensated when I didn't work, and I never once was underpaid for not compensated for hours I worked. Not all people paying salary are in it for themselves.
I am OP
This is not a salary, genius. Salary means you are paid a set weekly amount, regardless of the number of hours worked. You do not get paid more for working extra hours. You were guaranteed hours. Even if you stupidly and mistakenly want to call what you had a "salary," it still is not the situation OP described, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to post your idiocy.
I am OP genius. Read up little one. A salary does not always mean set pay for set hours. There are ways around that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are trying to pay a salary, which is not legal, nor is it beneficial to anyone but the employer. It is a terrible idea for a nanny, since you are paid for your time and not for the completion of any task. There is nothing to guarantee that it will all "even out", and many MANY of us have experienced the promises of getting to leave early followed by the reality of frequent late nights/early mornings. Do not even consider this position.
Unfortunately, they will find some poor sucker who will quickly see that $21/hour for 40 hours dwindle down to $15-16 for 50 hours and no overtime.
I have worked with two families who have paid by salary. It actually is not illegal at all. I've worked for an accountant family and an attorney family. My boyfriend is an attorney and he looked over my contracts. Never once was I not paid. I was paid a weekly salary rate ( with OT) and then any additional work I did for the week was paid at my OT rate in cash. This happened with both families. I was happily paid, compensated when I didn't work, and I never once was underpaid for not compensated for hours I worked. Not all people paying salary are in it for themselves.
I am OP
This is not a salary, genius. Salary means you are paid a set weekly amount, regardless of the number of hours worked. You do not get paid more for working extra hours. You were guaranteed hours. Even if you stupidly and mistakenly want to call what you had a "salary," it still is not the situation OP described, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to post your idiocy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are trying to pay a salary, which is not legal, nor is it beneficial to anyone but the employer. It is a terrible idea for a nanny, since you are paid for your time and not for the completion of any task. There is nothing to guarantee that it will all "even out", and many MANY of us have experienced the promises of getting to leave early followed by the reality of frequent late nights/early mornings. Do not even consider this position.
Unfortunately, they will find some poor sucker who will quickly see that $21/hour for 40 hours dwindle down to $15-16 for 50 hours and no overtime.
I have worked with two families who have paid by salary. It actually is not illegal at all. I've worked for an accountant family and an attorney family. My boyfriend is an attorney and he looked over my contracts. Never once was I not paid. I was paid a weekly salary rate ( with OT) and then any additional work I did for the week was paid at my OT rate in cash. This happened with both families. I was happily paid, compensated when I didn't work, and I never once was underpaid for not compensated for hours I worked. Not all people paying salary are in it for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Current position is ending do I am looking for a new one. I went on an interview for a nanny share. I liked them overall but they aren't paying very competitive ( $21/hr for two 12 week old infants). The mothers explained that it will be a weekly salary of $840 for 40 hours a week. They said some weeks I will leave earlier but still get paid and other weeks I will work more but still be paid the same rate. Their thinking was the pay and hours will even out.
Guaranteed hours are off the table and when I brought up OT, they said they wouldn't be paying that. Of course I am not considering this position but I've never heard of such a way to be paid in all my years of exp.
Does this seem odd and practically illegal?
Anonymous wrote:They are trying to pay a salary, which is not legal, nor is it beneficial to anyone but the employer. It is a terrible idea for a nanny, since you are paid for your time and not for the completion of any task. There is nothing to guarantee that it will all "even out", and many MANY of us have experienced the promises of getting to leave early followed by the reality of frequent late nights/early mornings. Do not even consider this position.
Unfortunately, they will find some poor sucker who will quickly see that $21/hour for 40 hours dwindle down to $15-16 for 50 hours and no overtime.
Anonymous wrote:Current position is ending do I am looking for a new one. I went on an interview for a nanny share. I liked them overall but they aren't paying very competitive ( $21/hr for two 12 week old infants). The mothers explained that it will be a weekly salary of $840 for 40 hours a week. They said some weeks I will leave earlier but still get paid and other weeks I will work more but still be paid the same rate. Their thinking was the pay and hours will even out.
Guaranteed hours are off the table and when I brought up OT, they said they wouldn't be paying that. Of course I am not considering this position but I've never heard of such a way to be paid in all my years of exp.
Does this seem odd and practically illegal?