Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think what is more telling is that this family can't decide between the career nanny and the one with less than half her experience.
Doesn't say much for those 20 years.
Exactly this. In this industry numerical experience isn't all that important. I would give a young nanny her first job if she seemed like a mature, sweet, smart woman over some old "career nanny" my kids won't even like.
+1
OP you didn't say anything about how either woman struck you, how much you liked them, anything specific. If the nanny with 20yrs experience didn't blow your socks off...why not? And what was it about the younger, short-term nanny that makes her comparable for you? Was she much warmer, easier to talk to, more up on current practices and recommendations? On paper there is no obvious answer to your question because it is too subjective.
It's kind of like choosing your PCP - a doctor may have decades of experience, but if they don't listen to you and communicate well, that experience won't count for much. This is a personal job and you have a lot of time still; if neither of these women wowed you, keep interviewing.
I agree with the bolded section.
I'm an MB and, all things being equal, I would gravitate to the candidate who stood the best chance of being with us for the entire time we could foresee wanting/needing a nanny - which for us is somewhere in the neighborhood of 5-7 years. But preceding that would be the question of fit. Do we click, do we share a similar philosophy re the care of the kid(s), do I trust him/her, does he/she communicate well with me, etc...
Sounds like both of your candidates have a good amount of experience, but they sound pretty different in terms of availability for long term tenure, and there are a host of other factors you don't mention.