nannydebsays wrote:I think this is a situation where following the law is fine as long as employers know that most nannies will not know the law, and will likely be hurt and/or angered that what they see as half of their grocery money is being haggled over by people more well off than they are.
For example, let's say that Nanny Jane will be off Christmas Day only, and will work her regularly scheduled 11 hour days pre- and post-Christmas. Nanny Jane makes $15/hour, $22.50/hour for overtime.
Is it wiser for her employers to pay her for 4 11 hour days and an 8 hour day (52 hours), or to pay her for her regular 55 hours/week?
Paying Jane for 52 hours Christmas week saves her employers $67.50. Is that savings worth it? Or would it be smarter and better practice to pay Jane her normal rate?
Employers need to decide this for themselves, based on the legalities and the nuances of a close employee/employer relationship.
nannydebsays wrote:I think this is a situation where following the law is fine as long as employers know that most nannies will not know the law, and will likely be hurt and/or angered that what they see as half of their grocery money is being haggled over by people more well off than they are.
For example, let's say that Nanny Jane will be off Christmas Day only, and will work her regularly scheduled 11 hour days pre- and post-Christmas. Nanny Jane makes $15/hour, $22.50/hour for overtime.
Is it wiser for her employers to pay her for 4 11 hour days and an 8 hour day (52 hours), or to pay her for her regular 55 hours/week?
Paying Jane for 52 hours Christmas week saves her employers $67.50. Is that savings worth it? Or would it be smarter and better practice to pay Jane her normal rate?
Employers need to decide this for themselves, based on the legalities and the nuances of a close employee/employer relationship.
Anonymous wrote:What is the standard practice regarding paying a nanny OT for paid holidays/vacation/sick leave? Is it it standard practice to pay your nanny the OT rate on days she isn't physically working? For example our nanny will be working 10 hour days so we pay her time and a half for anything over 40 hours (OT for 2 hours each day or 10 hours per week). I've been told that under DC law we don't legally have to pay the OT rate (we are only required to pay the regular rate for the 10 hours) on days she does not physically work (like a Federal holiday). Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts on this issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If she is guarenteed 5pm hours/week, I'd go ahead and pay the OT even in a holiday week. It may be more generous than the letter of the law, but i think it upholds the spirit of guarenteed hours, which is about guaranteeing income.
If however, you were ever in a situation where you were talking about OT above him guarenteed hours (unusual for s 50 hour week... But it could happen) then, no, I'd only pay the additional hours at OT rate if actually more than 40 hours were worked.
+1
The spirit of guaranteed hours and holiday pay is that a nanny can depend on the same paycheck every week. If you tried to not include the overtime rate I'd be pretty upset.
But I agree with PP, if your nanny is doing work outside her normal schedule, but due to holidays still worked fewer than 40 hours that week, I think it's ok to pay those extra hours at her normal rate. Just be sure this is something you discuss and agree upon up front.
Anonymous wrote:Us she live in? If so, you do not have to pay OT but you have to pay straight hourly rate. If she is live out, you o sy OT.
Anonymous wrote:If she is guarenteed 5pm hours/week, I'd go ahead and pay the OT even in a holiday week. It may be more generous than the letter of the law, but i think it upholds the spirit of guarenteed hours, which is about guaranteeing income.
If however, you were ever in a situation where you were talking about OT above him guarenteed hours (unusual for s 50 hour week... But it could happen) then, no, I'd only pay the additional hours at OT rate if actually more than 40 hours were worked.