Anonymous wrote:Op here, would still love to know from mbs if you require any vax to care for your infant or children. Thx
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vaccines are a very contested issue. 61 studies with hundreds of thousands of patients found the flu vaccine did not have any effect on transmissions, ER visits, or hospitalization, contrary to CDCs claims otherwise. Only two or three places in the entire country require hospital staff to get the flu shot. Teachers are not required either. My kids don't get the vaccine and I would not require my nanny to either. I am also a healthcare professional. There are others that we do get, however because they are much safer.
That is not true. The majority of hospitals provide free mandatory flu shots to their employees. My sister works at a hospital in Indiana and has to get one, my brother works at a hospital in Michigan and has to get one, and I volunteer at a hospital in Ohio and I am required to get one. Unless these are the only three hospitals in the entire country that require this, then you statement is not even close to being true. Also, my sister is a resident fresh out of med school and she is of the opinion that anyone who does not get the flu shot is an idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Vaccines are a very contested issue. 61 studies with hundreds of thousands of patients found the flu vaccine did not have any effect on transmissions, ER visits, or hospitalization, contrary to CDCs claims otherwise. Only two or three places in the entire country require hospital staff to get the flu shot. Teachers are not required either. My kids don't get the vaccine and I would not require my nanny to either. I am also a healthcare professional. There are others that we do get, however because they are much safer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:flu shot protects against *some* strains of the flu - why not eliminate the possibility of your baby getting that flu strain from your nanny?
Your point does not even begin to cover the substance of the issue. To be fair the average consumer who has not looked into this would respond the same way.
Anonymous wrote:flu shot protects against *some* strains of the flu - why not eliminate the possibility of your baby getting that flu strain from your nanny?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vaccines are a very contested issue. 61 studies with hundreds of thousands of patients found the flu vaccine did not have any effect on transmissions, ER visits, or hospitalization, contrary to CDCs claims otherwise. Only two or three places in the entire country require hospital staff to get the flu shot. Teachers are not required either. My kids don't get the vaccine and I would not require my nanny to either. I am also a healthcare professional. There are others that we do get, however because they are much safer.
I'm the PP who said I required the nanny to get the pertussis and flu shot. Teachers don't have to take care of newborns. I had a newborn when I hired our nanny. It's not worth the risk to me of exposing my newborn to the flu. I understand that vaccines are a contested issue so if a nanny has an issue with that requirement that's fine but then they can't work for me. And by the way, I'm a healthcare professional too.
Anonymous wrote:Vaccines are a very contested issue. 61 studies with hundreds of thousands of patients found the flu vaccine did not have any effect on transmissions, ER visits, or hospitalization, contrary to CDCs claims otherwise. Only two or three places in the entire country require hospital staff to get the flu shot. Teachers are not required either. My kids don't get the vaccine and I would not require my nanny to either. I am also a healthcare professional. There are others that we do get, however because they are much safer.