Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.

Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.

Perhaps those law breakers need to be jailed.

Then they better lock up the nannies too. They are both breaking the law. Why discriminate against the employers. If a nanny takes a job for less then minimum wage why not convict her of a serious crime and throw her in prison for 20 to life

No one locks up the victims of the rich employers, you fool.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.

Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.

Perhaps those law breakers need to be jailed.

Then they better lock up the nannies too. They are both breaking the law. Why discriminate against the employers. If a nanny takes a job for less then minimum wage why not convict her of a serious crime and throw her in prison for 20 to life

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.

Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.

Perhaps those law breakers need to be jailed.

Anonymous wrote:The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.

Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.

Lots of wanna be employers simply can't afford a legal nanny.

The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.

No one.

Our last two nannies had their hourly rate and straight lined it even if they babysat til 10pm.

Payroll companies are apparently promoting this dishonest scheme.

Beware!

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with an average rate if the employer spells out, in the contract, how an average rate accounts for OT.

Most nannies interview with a weekly amount they want to make. Dividing that into an average rate and spelling out OT fully explains how they can earn the weekly amount they want to earn.

That is the simple truth.

Yeah, we've heard that lie before.

There is nothing wrong with an average rate if the employer spells out, in the contract, how an average rate accounts for OT.

Most nannies interview with a weekly amount they want to make. Dividing that into an average rate and spelling out OT fully explains how they can earn the weekly amount they want to earn.

That is the simple truth.

Not a single nanny is confused about OT rates. I hope that no more parents will resort to the dishonest so-called "average" or "blended" hourly pay rates, as it's clearly an attempt to deceive naive young nannies who don't know better.

These nannies deserve the simple truth, with regard to their hourly wages, not artificially inflated calculations.

Anonymous wrote:And you stop your rude generalizations.

What generalization are you creating?

Anonymous wrote:And you stop your rude generalizations.

Yes please. I'm getting really sick of this poster. I'm sorry you've had shitty employers. I've been a nanny for 10 years and have never had a shitty employer

And you stop your rude generalizations.

Sick and tired of bogus payment plans. MB schemes to cheat dumb nannies, is just wrong. I'm sorry.

I don't believe you hire nannies who can't figure out OT.

Pay rate is $20/hr.
Time and a half is:

$20.
+$10.
_______
$30./hr

Did you hire someone who doesn't get that?

Your "blended" rates, your "average" rates, and whatever other creative financing terminology you can whip up, is nothing but an effort to fool the nanny into thinking you're paying more than you are.

Please stop that garbage.