Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It all depends on what your expectations are of her OP.
If you expect her to pick up one of your children in case of illness, school emergency, etc....In other words, if you want her to be on stand-by, then I would say you should pay her a certain flat rate for that. Because if she is going to save those hours for you, then she will not be able to give those hours to another family and thus will be losing money in the process.
But if your kids are in school and she will not be needed to be on call/stand-by, then no you do not need to pay her.
However, if she needs the hours, and you can afford to pay her the hours along w/paying for your children's tuition, you can make a deal w/her.
Perhaps she can do some housekeeping during those 4 hours for you. Or run some errands, buy some groceries, do some family laundry/ironing, dog walking or any other household task.
No, nannies do not do your personal housekeeping tasks.
Now if she's really your "mother's helper," not a nanny, that's different.
Anonymous wrote:It all depends on what your expectations are of her OP.
If you expect her to pick up one of your children in case of illness, school emergency, etc....In other words, if you want her to be on stand-by, then I would say you should pay her a certain flat rate for that. Because if she is going to save those hours for you, then she will not be able to give those hours to another family and thus will be losing money in the process.
But if your kids are in school and she will not be needed to be on call/stand-by, then no you do not need to pay her.
However, if she needs the hours, and you can afford to pay her the hours along w/paying for your children's tuition, you can make a deal w/her.
Perhaps she can do some housekeeping during those 4 hours for you. Or run some errands, buy some groceries, do some family laundry/ironing, dog walking or any other household task.
Anonymous wrote:We have a part-time live-in nanny who we pay for before and after school care. Our kids are in full-time programmes so this means she works 7-10 a.m. and 3:30-6:30 p.m. This is how we advertised the job and it suits her as she is a university student and artist so makes good use of the time she is not on the clock. If she is available to look after the kids when they are sick, which she usually is (yay!) then we pay her an additional hourly rate. She will also work full time in the summer for a few weeks when the kids are not in camp. This is how we advertised the job and we didn't have tons of applicants but if you are patient you can eventually find someone who is a good fit.
If you are looking at live-out, I don't think you are likely to find someone who is willing to sit at your house for four hours not getting paid. And if you don't pay her for that period, you can't expect her to be available when the kids are sick etc. If you already have a nanny, it would be wrong to stop paying her for those hours if they were part of your original agreement.
Have you considered an au pair? It sounds like that might be your best option as they tend to be more flexible, but of course they live in with you, so you really have to be open to that and have the space to accommodate them.
If not an au pair, then maybe a nanny share, where another family can use her for those four hours every day? Note however that again you will not have first dibs on her time if your kids are sick, and you might have to be willing to host the share and have some overlap when all the kids are together.
Anonymous wrote:Hello all - I do not want to nickle or dime my nanny. I am just trying to understand what is the most appropriate practice that is as fair as possible to all parties. My kids are in school five mornings a week for four hours a day. Do folks in similar situations still pay for a full-time nanny or do you just hire the nanny for the hours your kids are out of school? Thanks. I know there are other considerations, like if school is cancelled, sick kid, etc. but I am just generally trying to get a rough idea of what folks do. Thanks!