Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's interesting to me how if $8 of petty cash is unaccounted for, the nanny is a thief but if a nanny is shorted $8 from her check they should let it go.
Was that a thread recently? Must have missed it. I'm an MB and wouldn't care if there was a missing 8 bucks from the petty cash. 20 bucks sure, but if OP was shorted 20 bucks no one would be telling her to let it go.
There have been threads about nannies "stealing" toilet paper, or water. You really think most MBs would be cool if there were ANY money missing from the household, and they knew the nanny took it for whatever reason?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's interesting to me how if $8 of petty cash is unaccounted for, the nanny is a thief but if a nanny is shorted $8 from her check they should let it go.
Was that a thread recently? Must have missed it. I'm an MB and wouldn't care if there was a missing 8 bucks from the petty cash. 20 bucks sure, but if OP was shorted 20 bucks no one would be telling her to let it go.
There have been threads about nannies "stealing" toilet paper, or water. You really think most MBs would be cool if there were ANY money missing from the household, and they knew the nanny took it for whatever reason?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's interesting to me how if $8 of petty cash is unaccounted for, the nanny is a thief but if a nanny is shorted $8 from her check they should let it go.
Was that a thread recently? Must have missed it. I'm an MB and wouldn't care if there was a missing 8 bucks from the petty cash. 20 bucks sure, but if OP was shorted 20 bucks no one would be telling her to let it go.
Anonymous wrote:It's interesting to me how if $8 of petty cash is unaccounted for, the nanny is a thief but if a nanny is shorted $8 from her check they should let it go.