Anonymous wrote:40
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for your replies. I agree with you all. I am a nanny and have recently accepted a new position. The family only offers benefits, guaranteed hours, and payment on the books to nannies working 40 hours a week. I knew this at the interview but was hoping they would reconsider. The job is 3 days/week. They also are paying $1 lower than my lowest acceptable rate. Not accepting the position is not an option for me. I just really want to be able to stay with them long term, and feel like it's not possible without these benefits. I would like to counter their original offer, but am not sure what to respond with.
I guess I would really like them to guarantee my hours, as I am not planning to take a lot of days of myself, but don't know how often they won't need me. This would include being paid for holidays that fall on a working day. I guess if I want to take time off for vacation or if I am sick, I will take it unpaid, or perhaps see if I can make up the days on the days I am not usually working. I'd also really like them to bump up the rate $1 but I'm not sure they can afford to do so right now. Do you think that is fair?
If I were you, I wouldn't risk the job by bringing up the benefits again. They know that you wanted them, and they decided against it. You should quietly continue looking for a better offer. That's the risk you take when you choose to be cheap, or try to afford what you cannot.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for your replies. I agree with you all. I am a nanny and have recently accepted a new position. The family only offers benefits, guaranteed hours, and payment on the books to nannies working 40 hours a week. I knew this at the interview but was hoping they would reconsider. The job is 3 days/week. They also are paying $1 lower than my lowest acceptable rate. Not accepting the position is not an option for me. I just really want to be able to stay with them long term, and feel like it's not possible without these benefits. I would like to counter their original offer, but am not sure what to respond with.
I guess I would really like them to guarantee my hours, as I am not planning to take a lot of days of myself, but don't know how often they won't need me. This would include being paid for holidays that fall on a working day. I guess if I want to take time off for vacation or if I am sick, I will take it unpaid, or perhaps see if I can make up the days on the days I am not usually working. I'd also really like them to bump up the rate $1 but I'm not sure they can afford to do so right now. Do you think that is fair?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MB here, I think 35+ is full-time.
DS' nanny works 25 hrs a week but has sick days, some holidays (DH and I don't get all fed holidays off), vacation, and guaranteed pay.
Agree. This is what we offered to a 24-hr-week nanny. Since she only worked three days a week, one week of PTO = 3 days, not 5.
Anonymous wrote:MB here, I think 35+ is full-time.
DS' nanny works 25 hrs a week but has sick days, some holidays (DH and I don't get all fed holidays off), vacation, and guaranteed pay.
Anonymous wrote:As a nanny, I always try to negotiate some kind of benefits and guaranteed hours commensurate with the amount of hours. I'm going to get sick, I'm going to need time off, and there will be times when I am not needed. I still expect my full paycheck.
I don't understand or buy into the idea that part time employees shouldn't get benefits, and no one here has ever presented a compelling reason beyond "that's just how it's done." If parents expect a quality caregiver to be committed to their part time job, it needs to be worth committing to.