Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Was the nanny mediocre?"
$19/hr is not at all bad. particularly when PP did not say WHERE she is located nor for how many hours they used the share.
If 19 an hour is good for you doing a nanny share, that's all that really matters. For me, it would not be acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:"Was the nanny mediocre?"
$19/hr is not at all bad. particularly when PP did not say WHERE she is located nor for how many hours they used the share.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we had a nanny share, we paid $15/hr for one child, $19/hr for two kids (split between both families).
Was the nanny mediocre?
No, she was an excellent infant nanny with 17 yrs of experience.
Why don't we hear more often from mb's about amazing nannies on this forum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we had a nanny share, we paid $15/hr for one child, $19/hr for two kids (split between both families).
Was the nanny mediocre?
No, she was an excellent infant nanny with 17 yrs of experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we had a nanny share, we paid $15/hr for one child, $19/hr for two kids (split between both families).
Was the nanny mediocre?
Anonymous wrote:When we had a nanny share, we paid $15/hr for one child, $19/hr for two kids (split between both families).
Anonymous wrote:I currently split my week between two families, and now they would like to begin sharing one day per week. What percentage of my normal hourly pay is appropriate to ask for on share days?
Anonymous wrote:While I was a nanny, I became licensed to open a preschool program in part of my home. My employer asked if she could continue to have me work with her child in my program. She even volunteered to maintain my same hourly rate if I agreed. Consistancy of care was important to those parents.
Anonymous wrote:I would up your normal hourly pay on the 1 overlap day to 1.3 to 1.5 times as much so you get more but each family pay less as well. If they try to overlap for more of the week though then something closer to 1.2 to 1.3 times your normal rate would likely be a better match.