Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work regardless if the children are sick. I have even been in the hospital with children who are very sick so their parents can get to work.
A parent who would go to work over being with their hospitalized child has their priorities completely out of whack. Workaholics like that should never have kids.
In theory I agree with you but you don't know what the parents do that they weren't at the hospital. I'm the PP who said I can't ever miss work but I did stay home the one day when my DS was sick enough that I thought I might have to take him to the hospital. I also risked losing my job because of it. When my children are sick I'd much rather stay home and take care of them and its not because I'm a workaholic and would rather be at work that I don't stay home. It's the nature of my profession that I can't stay home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work regardless if the children are sick. I have even been in the hospital with children who are very sick so their parents can get to work.
A parent who would go to work over being with their hospitalized child has their priorities completely out of whack. Workaholics like that should never have kids.
Anonymous wrote:Okay MB's then what do you do when your nanny gets sick from your children? If you can't possibly ever, ever miss work, you should have a back up nanny on hand.
Anonymous wrote:I work regardless if the children are sick. I have even been in the hospital with children who are very sick so their parents can get to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
In most cases, if the kids are running a fever or vomiting, you have already been exposed to whatever it is they are carrying. Not going in, in this case, would not prevent you from becoming ill. I can understand not wanting to take care of children who are vomiting all day (though I have done it on numerous occasions...just the kind of nanny that I am) but don't fool yourself or the parent's that it's for your own safety.
Sick care is always a matter of personal preference but it is really nothing out of the ordinary to have to be with kids when they are sick. Isn't that one of the benefits of hiring a nanny over sending children to day care??
+1
Another +1.
This is one of the primary reasons we chose a nanny over daycare.
That being said, there was an occasion when my kids were so sick that I actually didn't think it was fair to the nanny so I stayed home. But otherwise a nanny who was unwilling to care for sick kids wouldn't be someone who we could hire.
Another +1.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
In most cases, if the kids are running a fever or vomiting, you have already been exposed to whatever it is they are carrying. Not going in, in this case, would not prevent you from becoming ill. I can understand not wanting to take care of children who are vomiting all day (though I have done it on numerous occasions...just the kind of nanny that I am) but don't fool yourself or the parent's that it's for your own safety.
Sick care is always a matter of personal preference but it is really nothing out of the ordinary to have to be with kids when they are sick. Isn't that one of the benefits of hiring a nanny over sending children to day care??
+1
Another +1.
This is one of the primary reasons we chose a nanny over daycare.
That being said, there was an occasion when my kids were so sick that I actually didn't think it was fair to the nanny so I stayed home. But otherwise a nanny who was unwilling to care for sick kids wouldn't be someone who we could hire.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In most cases, if the kids are running a fever or vomiting, you have already been exposed to whatever it is they are carrying. Not going in, in this case, would not prevent you from becoming ill. I can understand not wanting to take care of children who are vomiting all day (though I have done it on numerous occasions...just the kind of nanny that I am) but don't fool yourself or the parent's that it's for your own safety.
Sick care is always a matter of personal preference but it is really nothing out of the ordinary to have to be with kids when they are sick. Isn't that one of the benefits of hiring a nanny over sending children to day care??
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In most cases, if the kids are running a fever or vomiting, you have already been exposed to whatever it is they are carrying. Not going in, in this case, would not prevent you from becoming ill. I can understand not wanting to take care of children who are vomiting all day (though I have done it on numerous occasions...just the kind of nanny that I am) but don't fool yourself or the parent's that it's for your own safety.
Sick care is always a matter of personal preference but it is really nothing out of the ordinary to have to be with kids when they are sick. Isn't that one of the benefits of hiring a nanny over sending children to day care??
+1
Anonymous wrote:In most cases, if the kids are running a fever or vomiting, you have already been exposed to whatever it is they are carrying. Not going in, in this case, would not prevent you from becoming ill. I can understand not wanting to take care of children who are vomiting all day (though I have done it on numerous occasions...just the kind of nanny that I am) but don't fool yourself or the parent's that it's for your own safety.
Sick care is always a matter of personal preference but it is really nothing out of the ordinary to have to be with kids when they are sick. Isn't that one of the benefits of hiring a nanny over sending children to day care??