Anonymous wrote:OP I would have a problem that the missing reference was the most recent one. If the most recent and second were available and the oldest reference was missing then I would be less concerned about it.
A recent reference is the most important one because the experience is fresh in the past employer's mind and it reflects where the employee is now as opposed to several years in the past. People change overtime. Someone who was irresponsible with time 5 years ago may have learned her lesson and is now super punctual. Some nannies burn out so hearing that someone was high energy and took initiative 5 years ago may not be this way anymore.
I agree with a previous poster that many nannies provide fake references or even numbers they know are disconnected to avoid revealing a poor work history. However, I disagree with the perspective that references should be ignored and the nanny just given the benefit of the doubt. This just rewards bad behavior and will lead employers to hire unsuitable nannies (which is exactly what the unsuitable nannies want). Fake references can usually be spotted by engaging the reference in a conversation and verifying details.
Anonymous wrote:Nowhere in any of OP's post does she say that the disconnected number was her most recent job.
You seem bitter.
What exactly was bitter about that post?
The OP did write that the nanny's last reference was missing. It reads as if OP means the nannies last or previous job not the last one on the list. It is a very bad idea to hire someone who can not produce a reference from their most recent job.
Nowhere in any of OP's post does she say that the disconnected number was her most recent job.
You seem bitter.
Anonymous wrote:OP I would have a problem that the missing reference was the most recent one. If the most recent and second were available and the oldest reference was missing then I would be less concerned about it.
A recent reference is the most important one because the experience is fresh in the past employer's mind and it reflects where the employee is now as opposed to several years in the past. People change overtime. Someone who was irresponsible with time 5 years ago may have learned her lesson and is now super punctual. Some nannies burn out so hearing that someone was high energy and took initiative 5 years ago may not be this way anymore.
I agree with a previous poster that many nannies provide fake references or even numbers they know are disconnected to avoid revealing a poor work history. However, I disagree with the perspective that references should be ignored and the nanny just given the benefit of the doubt. This just rewards bad behavior and will lead employers to hire unsuitable nannies (which is exactly what the unsuitable nannies want). Fake references can usually be spotted by engaging the reference in a conversation and verifying details.
Anonymous wrote:References mean very little to me, fake references are so common. *Unless* she was a live-in and past employer's address matches past address on her BG check. I would place way more importance on the BG check, driving record and your own sense of judgement.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you for your advice! We did do a background check and she is very clean!
I called a few babysitting references and got good reviews too. I guess that is enough.
Anonymous wrote:M husband and I are looking for a nanny for our infant daughter. We interviewed with a wonderful woman that we like a lot. She gave us a list of references to call/email. I was only able to reach 2 out of 3 references. Her last references # was disconnected so I emailed and haven't had a response. It's been a few days. I know that she worked long-term for them and they were willing to give her a reference. When I asked her about it, she said she only had those contacts and she didn't know how else to get in touch with them. Should we proceed with her anyway or have caution? I would love any advice.
P.s. Her other references ( all long-term) gave her great reviews!