Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MB here. I don't think I have much you'll want to hear, because it sounds to me like you're not getting the skill set or capabilities you want and need at the rate you're paying.
Even though the nanny doesn't have 4 kids to manage all day long, that is a significant number of kids even for a couple of hours, and with a significant age range and scope of responsibilities. It sounds pretty challenging to me to manage homework, snacks, infant care, and preschooler entertainment simultaneously every day for several hours. (I consider 3 several.) If the nanny is expected to leave the house in a clean and orderly state when she leaves (as mine is) that's also tricky to ensure when her peak craziness is at the end of the day.
It may not be an "insanely heavy workload" but it certainly isn't an easy job you're describing.
It honestly sounds pretty exhausting to me. If you know you're paying middle of the road rates, then so do your nannies and the reality for them is that they can make equal money (or better) for less work. They're getting great experience in managing multiple kids across age ranges and needs, but they can beat the money pretty easily.
So basically it sounds like you're running into the realities of the marketplace where you are. You have choices of course- plan on a more revolving door nanny arrangement and have back ups in place to weather the transitions; hire two nannies at a part time level so you have built-in backup (though you might have to pay more). Hire additional/cheaper help - a mommy's helper for after school with the kids for instance.
Or, do a search w/ a higher rate and see if it yields a stronger candidate pool.
Honestly, it sounds like you know the answer and you just don't like it. If you want better than middle of the road capabilities and tenure, then you need to pay better than middle of the road rates.
And I don't think 4 kids is typical - I think this is a job that skews to the more demanding/challenging positions - but I'll let the nannies here speak to that.
This is an excellent post and I completely agree with this MB. I'm curious as to what rate you are paying. I am paid $22 for 3 kids ( been with them for 5 years so this includes raises). Just because the kids nap doesn't mean it makes the job easy. There are always things that can be done when the child is napping. I'm not saying that nannies don't take a break but good ones will find things to do, and with 4 kids, there will always be something to do!
The age differences can also present a challenge. It's difficult to help older kids with homework, engage a toddler/pre-schooler and care for a baby. Kids are coming home from school and the baby is waking up from the second nap. Throw in cleaning and dinner prep and it's pretty much chaos for a few hours.
You will probably need to raise your rate in order to attract a candidate with the experience needed for this job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Middle of the road for 4. High average if it was just 3. When we've upped the listed wage, we get the same people for the most part. Anxious to make more money but not anxious to manage 4 kids.
We also run into a lot of candidates who really truly believe that a nanny job should be from 9-5. No concept of the parents needing to get to or from jobs. Even with staggered schedules it is tough to do that!
This alone tells me you aren't interviewing professional nanny candidates. Most nannies work 10-12 hours per day to account for the parents' commuting time; any nanny with even two years of experience knows this. You're clearly being too cheap to get any response from the nannies you'd like to employ (but not pay for).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MB here. I don't think I have much you'll want to hear, because it sounds to me like you're not getting the skill set or capabilities you want and need at the rate you're paying.
Even though the nanny doesn't have 4 kids to manage all day long, that is a significant number of kids even for a couple of hours, and with a significant age range and scope of responsibilities. It sounds pretty challenging to me to manage homework, snacks, infant care, and preschooler entertainment simultaneously every day for several hours. (I consider 3 several.) If the nanny is expected to leave the house in a clean and orderly state when she leaves (as mine is) that's also tricky to ensure when her peak craziness is at the end of the day.
It may not be an "insanely heavy workload" but it certainly isn't an easy job you're describing.
It honestly sounds pretty exhausting to me. If you know you're paying middle of the road rates, then so do your nannies and the reality for them is that they can make equal money (or better) for less work. They're getting great experience in managing multiple kids across age ranges and needs, but they can beat the money pretty easily.
So basically it sounds like you're running into the realities of the marketplace where you are. You have choices of course- plan on a more revolving door nanny arrangement and have back ups in place to weather the transitions; hire two nannies at a part time level so you have built-in backup (though you might have to pay more). Hire additional/cheaper help - a mommy's helper for after school with the kids for instance.
Or, do a search w/ a higher rate and see if it yields a stronger candidate pool.
Honestly, it sounds like you know the answer and you just don't like it. If you want better than middle of the road capabilities and tenure, then you need to pay better than middle of the road rates.
And I don't think 4 kids is typical - I think this is a job that skews to the more demanding/challenging positions - but I'll let the nannies here speak to that.
This is an excellent post and I completely agree with this MB. I'm curious as to what rate you are paying. I am paid $22 for 3 kids ( been with them for 5 years so this includes raises). Just because the kids nap doesn't mean it makes the job easy. There are always things that can be done when the child is napping. I'm not saying that nannies don't take a break but good ones will find things to do, and with 4 kids, there will always be something to do!
The age differences can also present a challenge. It's difficult to help older kids with homework, engage a toddler/pre-schooler and care for a baby. Kids are coming home from school and the baby is waking up from the second nap. Throw in cleaning and dinner prep and it's pretty much chaos for a few hours.
PP here....sorry. I just read your post again and see that you do not need dinner prep. That makes it a little easier but 4 kids is stil
alot of work. I think the age differences present the most challenges.
You will probably need to raise your rate in order to attract a candidate with the experience needed for this job.
Anonymous wrote:MB here. I don't think I have much you'll want to hear, because it sounds to me like you're not getting the skill set or capabilities you want and need at the rate you're paying.
Even though the nanny doesn't have 4 kids to manage all day long, that is a significant number of kids even for a couple of hours, and with a significant age range and scope of responsibilities. It sounds pretty challenging to me to manage homework, snacks, infant care, and preschooler entertainment simultaneously every day for several hours. (I consider 3 several.) If the nanny is expected to leave the house in a clean and orderly state when she leaves (as mine is) that's also tricky to ensure when her peak craziness is at the end of the day.
It may not be an "insanely heavy workload" but it certainly isn't an easy job you're describing.
It honestly sounds pretty exhausting to me. If you know you're paying middle of the road rates, then so do your nannies and the reality for them is that they can make equal money (or better) for less work. They're getting great experience in managing multiple kids across age ranges and needs, but they can beat the money pretty easily.
So basically it sounds like you're running into the realities of the marketplace where you are. You have choices of course- plan on a more revolving door nanny arrangement and have back ups in place to weather the transitions; hire two nannies at a part time level so you have built-in backup (though you might have to pay more). Hire additional/cheaper help - a mommy's helper for after school with the kids for instance.
Or, do a search w/ a higher rate and see if it yields a stronger candidate pool.
Honestly, it sounds like you know the answer and you just don't like it. If you want better than middle of the road capabilities and tenure, then you need to pay better than middle of the road rates.
And I don't think 4 kids is typical - I think this is a job that skews to the more demanding/challenging positions - but I'll let the nannies here speak to that.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Middle of the road for 4. High average if it was just 3. When we've upped the listed wage, we get the same people for the most part. Anxious to make more money but not anxious to manage 4 kids.
We also run into a lot of candidates who really truly believe that a nanny job should be from 9-5. No concept of the parents needing to get to or from jobs. Even with staggered schedules it is tough to do that!
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Middle of the road for 4. High average if it was just 3. When we've upped the listed wage, we get the same people for the most part. Anxious to make more money but not anxious to manage 4 kids.
We also run into a lot of candidates who really truly believe that a nanny job should be from 9-5. No concept of the parents needing to get to or from jobs. Even with staggered schedules it is tough to do that!