Anonymous wrote:STFU.

Everyone else, stop feeding the troll op.

Everyone, obey the control freak, or else...

STFU.

Everyone else, stop feeding the troll op.

Anonymous wrote:You just can't stop trying to shut down people who disagree with you, 17:28.

I guess trolling just isn't that fun unless you get the last word.

Oh, so now we know why you keep coming back to every thread you complain about. Your motive is childish, and your behavior here is more consistant with that of feuding tweens, rather than a grown woman wishing to engage in adult discussion and debate. Isn't there another more suitable outlet for your inappropriate obsession to control people you don't like? Thank you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.

No it's only bothersome because this topic has been talked about in length over and over and over again.

Why not search an old topic on this and read up on it instead of beating a dead horse again!

Funny how one poster keeps saying on various threads, how she believes that pay scale and performance are completely unrelated. Total silliness, IMO. Otherwise, she wouldn't be earning enough to have a nanny. She'd be getting peanuts for whatever work she was doing. She's trying to maintain her cheap nanny, it seems. Silly, huh?

Actually this is me.

And I don't know what other threads you are talking about or what you think I commented on.
This is the first money thread I actually have commented on - believe it or no I grew up with the thought that you don't talk to others about money (& religion and politics but those are other threads I'm sure).

Just so you know I am a nanny and a very happy one. I make great pay and work for a high profile family.

I'm sorry you are in such a bad part of your life but it can and will get better. We've all felt that feeling of negativity it's what we do with those feelings.

You just can't stop trying to shut down people who disagree with you, 17:28.

I guess trolling just isn't that fun unless you get the last word.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.



No it's only bothersome because this topic has been talked about in length over and over and over again.

Why not search an old topic on this and read up on it instead of beating a dead horse again!

Funny how one poster keeps saying on various threads, how she believes that pay scale and performance are completely unrelated. Total silliness, IMO. Otherwise, she wouldn't be earning enough to have a nanny. She'd be getting peanuts for whatever work she was doing. She's trying to maintain her cheap nanny, it seems. Silly, huh?

The only silly one is you, thinking there is only one person who calls you out on beating your dead horse. I've done it before and I'll do it again. This is my first post on this thread.

Face it, bitter nanny, many of us think you're nuts.

You again, who can't resist trying to shut down everyone you don't like.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.



No it's only bothersome because this topic has been talked about in length over and over and over again.

Why not search an old topic on this and read up on it instead of beating a dead horse again!

Funny how one poster keeps saying on various threads, how she believes that pay scale and performance are completely unrelated. Total silliness, IMO. Otherwise, she wouldn't be earning enough to have a nanny. She'd be getting peanuts for whatever work she was doing. She's trying to maintain her cheap nanny, it seems. Silly, huh?

The only silly one is you, thinking there is only one person who calls you out on beating your dead horse. I've done it before and I'll do it again. This is my first post on this thread.

Face it, bitter nanny, many of us think you're nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.

No it's only bothersome because this topic has been talked about in length over and over and over again.

Why not search an old topic on this and read up on it instead of beating a dead horse again!

Funny how one poster keeps saying on various threads, how she believes that pay scale and performance are completely unrelated. Total silliness, IMO. Otherwise, she wouldn't be earning enough to have a nanny. She'd be getting peanuts for whatever work she was doing. She's trying to maintain her cheap nanny, it seems. Silly, huh?

Anonymous wrote:This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.

No it's only bothersome because this topic has been talked about in length over and over and over again.

Why not search an old topic on this and read up on it instead of beating a dead horse again!

Anonymous wrote:This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.

True but do you really think the abusive employers or lazy nannies feel guilty? I don't really think they care or they wouldn't act that way so this thread isn't really going to make them say "oh you're RIGHT. I should change my ways"? Probably not, so then what is the point of this thread?

This is bothersome only to guilty people, either the lazy sitter or the abusive employer. Other people wouldn't waste their time on a thread that has no application to them.

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. MBs, please don't feed the crazy nanny by engaging in this discussion yet again.

No problem! Can't imagine who isn't tired of this ridiculousness by now.

Yawn. MBs, please don't feed the crazy nanny by engaging in this discussion yet again.

Ugh not this again

Outstanding employees earn outstanding wages. Every successful employer understands this concept. If you want excellence, you have to pay accordingly. Your nanny knows when you're paying her the minimum you think you can get away with. Why should she go 'above and beyond', when she knows you refuse to acknowledge her going the extra mile? She can play your game just as well as you do.

See how it works? You're getting over on her with your cheap wages, and she's getting over you with her constant laziness.

The problem is that neither of you seem to care about your child. The nanny will move on, and you'll eventually reap the consequences of neglecting to provide/employ proper care for your child. Bargain priced anything is never high quality. High quality ALWAYS costs more, regardless of how hard you may stamp your feet in rage in response to that fact.