Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MB here. I don't think you can ask her after the fact to contribute to the costs. She was driving in the course of performing her employment duties, so by default, the responsibility is yours. That's why you presumably added her to your auto insurance.
For the future, you could put something in her contract that says if she is found to be at fault, she will be responsible for some portion of the damages, even if driving on the job. I wouldn't do it, though, as I think it would just invite disputes over whether she was really at fault, to what degree, etc.
Really, this is just part of the liability you assume by letting the nanny drive your car. If it's too much for you or you think she is careless, consider not having her drive your kids.
Another MB here. Agree with this 100%.
+1 another MB. I might have her pay the deductible, but that's it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MB here. I don't think you can ask her after the fact to contribute to the costs. She was driving in the course of performing her employment duties, so by default, the responsibility is yours. That's why you presumably added her to your auto insurance.
For the future, you could put something in her contract that says if she is found to be at fault, she will be responsible for some portion of the damages, even if driving on the job. I wouldn't do it, though, as I think it would just invite disputes over whether she was really at fault, to what degree, etc.
Really, this is just part of the liability you assume by letting the nanny drive your car. If it's too much for you or you think she is careless, consider not having her drive your kids.
Another MB here. Agree with this 100%.
Anonymous wrote:MB here. I don't think you can ask her after the fact to contribute to the costs. She was driving in the course of performing her employment duties, so by default, the responsibility is yours. That's why you presumably added her to your auto insurance.
For the future, you could put something in her contract that says if she is found to be at fault, she will be responsible for some portion of the damages, even if driving on the job. I wouldn't do it, though, as I think it would just invite disputes over whether she was really at fault, to what degree, etc.
Really, this is just part of the liability you assume by letting the nanny drive your car. If it's too much for you or you think she is careless, consider not having her drive your kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, if you think she has some "disposable income" based on what you pay her and her basic cost of living, she should contribute something.
How did the accident happen?
I don't understand this argument. If she was driving the car, and she was at fault, why wouldn't she pay for some of the damage? [/quot
e]
Are you the one who doesn't read very well? I did say the nanny should help pay, unless she's already living hand-to-mouth, in which case she'll go get a new job. We don't know if OP cares about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're the employer and that is the risk you take by having an employee drive your car for work related purposes. If it happened in the course of her duties, it's on you. No different than if a UPS driver or Pepsi deliveryman got in an accident. They might loose their job, but insurance would cover the damage.
So by this logic, you'd be ok if OP fired her nanny for this.
Anonymous wrote:You're the employer and that is the risk you take by having an employee drive your car for work related purposes. If it happened in the course of her duties, it's on you. No different than if a UPS driver or Pepsi deliveryman got in an accident. They might loose their job, but insurance would cover the damage.
Anonymous wrote:Sure, if you think she has some "disposable income" based on what you pay her and her basic cost of living, she should contribute something.
How did the accident happen?