The local standard is to pay regular rates while the children are awake, plus a flat stipend of $50 to $100 for being on call in the house all night, but sleeping. So, $50 would be a bit low, and $100 would be a bit high. If the nanny normally starts after 7 am but you need her to wake up with the kids at 7 in your absence, you should, of course, pay your contracted rate for the extra morning hours.
My own nanny charges $75 for overnights.
Anonymous wrote:The local standard is to pay regular rates while the children are awake, plus a flat stipend of $50 to $100 for being on call in the house all night, but sleeping. So, $50 would be a bit low, and $100 would be a bit high. If the nanny normally starts after 7 am but you need her to wake up with the kids at 7 in your absence, you should, of course, pay your contracted rate for the extra morning hours.
My own nanny charges $75 for overnights.
Anonymous wrote:The local standard is to pay regular rates while the children are awake, plus a flat stipend of $50 to $100 for being on call in the house all night, but sleeping. So, $50 would be a bit low, and $100 would be a bit high. If the nanny normally starts after 7 am but you need her to wake up with the kids at 7 in your absence, you should, of course, pay your contracted rate for the extra morning hours.
My own nanny charges $75 for overnights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very fair, OP.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Very fair, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hmm -wrote a reply and lost it. OP here. Thanks that really helps and confirms my thought that $50 is way too low. I am inclining toward $100. Kids are 5 and 3 and sleep reliably 7 to 7. And putting them to bed is part of the nanny's daily routine anyway as I often get back late.
Obviously if she had to get up in the night with them for some odd reason, then I'd pay that at time and a half. Does this sound fair?
If she is a live in, in DC and VA, they are not paid time and one half.
Anonymous wrote:Hmm -wrote a reply and lost it. OP here. Thanks that really helps and confirms my thought that $50 is way too low. I am inclining toward $100. Kids are 5 and 3 and sleep reliably 7 to 7. And putting them to bed is part of the nanny's daily routine anyway as I often get back late.
Obviously if she had to get up in the night with them for some odd reason, then I'd pay that at time and a half. Does this sound fair?