Anonymous wrote:
If this nanny is the primary caregiver, it is indeed MOST appropriate for MB to consider if a relocation would force a broken bond between her children and their primary caregiver.
You parents who don't consider such details, are ruthless.
Here we have an OUTSTANDING example of how every MB should be, who has a hired FT nanny.
Regardless of the outcome, kudos to OP for putting her children's security and welfare, over that of a new house.
Regardless of the outcome, kudos to OP for putting her children's security and welfare, over that of a new house.
Anonymous wrote:
If this nanny is the primary caregiver, it is indeed MOST appropriate for MB to consider if a relocation would force a broken bond between her children and their primary caregiver.
You parents who don't consider such details, are ruthless.
Here we have an OUTSTANDING example of how every MB should be, who has a hired FT nanny.
Regardless of the outcome, kudos to OP for putting her children's security and welfare, over that of a new house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous
i don't think you should be making housing decisions (for purchase at least, perhaps renting would be different) based on your nanny's commute. But I certainly think it would be considerate to talk about it with her so you all know what to plan for and/or what to worry about.
This is great advice.
Anonymous
i don't think you should be making housing decisions (for purchase at least, perhaps renting would be different) based on your nanny's commute. But I certainly think it would be considerate to talk about it with her so you all know what to plan for and/or what to worry about.