Anonymous wrote:Headline in today's Real Estate section of the Washington Post. It's generally accepted as common knowledge. It's no different when you hire a nanny. There are no short cuts here. If you can't afford decent childcare, you have no business endangering your child's safety and well-being. If you're on the brink of welfare, ok, that's a different story.

You do know that the REALTOR mafia in America is not held in great esteem, and frankly looked down upon as a low value add, high fee, dying business model. Virtually no entry requirements and never aligned with their customers. Just want to close a deal, similar to some wannabe nannies I suppose.
And that WaPo is low on the journalism totem pole.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Headline in today's Real Estate section of the Washington Post. It's generally accepted as common knowledge. It's no different when you hire a nanny. There are no short cuts here. If you can't afford decent childcare, you have no business endangering your child's safety and well-being. If you're on the brink of welfare, ok, that's a different story.

You are not even worth $.05/hr. Dumb as a box of rocks.

So says the disgruntled employer of a bargain nanny.

TROLL. This person posts all the time. Get a life

Anonymous wrote:Headline in today's Real Estate section of the Washington Post. It's generally accepted as common knowledge. It's no different when you hire a nanny. There are no short cuts here. If you can't afford decent childcare, you have no business endangering your child's safety and well-being. If you're on the brink of welfare, ok, that's a different story.

You are not even worth $.05/hr. Dumb as a box of rocks.

Maybe those bargain nannies are the cause of so many disgruntled employers.

The headline in the Washington Post relates to how it is in the real world.

Wow, the headline in the real estate section relates to how someone thinks of their nanny?

You're really off your rocker, OP. Your multi posting garbage about slavery and mommy dearest and such show exactly how crazy you are.

Find another playground. In spite of your paranoia, most people here are involved in professional nanny/family relationships.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slave owners tried to stop communication and education to. Today you no longer have that power, at least not in America. Perhaps you'd be more successful in another culture?

Are you REALLY trying to equate slavery and voluntary paid employment?

No. Reread my post as many times as you need to. I said exactly what I mean. Which part shall we explain for you?

Anonymous wrote:Slave owners tried to stop communication and education to. Today you no longer have that power, at least not in America. Perhaps you'd be more successful in another culture?

Are you REALLY trying to equate slavery and voluntary paid employment?

Slave owners tried to stop communication and education to. Today you no longer have that power, at least not in America. Perhaps you'd be more successful in another culture?

OMG just stop. Your rants are seriously annoying.

Headline in today's Real Estate section of the Washington Post. It's generally accepted as common knowledge. It's no different when you hire a nanny. There are no short cuts here. If you can't afford decent childcare, you have no business endangering your child's safety and well-being. If you're on the brink of welfare, ok, that's a different story.