Anonymous wrote:"*eyeroll* you shouldn't be treating your charges any differently than you would in front of your MB anyway. who cares?"
exactly. Any nanny actually doing a good job should be happy about this - the prospect that a 3rd party, totally unbiased woul report how nicely she interacts with and plays with the kids. those that are seeing this only as a gotcha trap obviously know they are not doing as well with the kids as they should.
Anonymous wrote:I completely agree that the child-losing incident was unfortunate and not even mostly the fault of inadequate security at the Playseum. That said, spying on nannies?!? Really? How is a 20-year-old worker at the Playseum to determine if a nanny is doing a good job or not? Will there be a rating scale of some sort? What about the nanny who might have gone into work a little under the weather, not wanting to let the MB down on a big work day, takes the kid to the Playseum, and uses the entertainment of the activities there to take a well-deserved chill on a bench while DC is happily playing? Is that nanny negligent? The toddler who has a horrible day and is throwing fit after fit. Is the nanny a crappy nanny? If you can't trust your nanny, there are better ways to sort this out.
If you really want to "catch" nannies ignoring their charges, try the North Hall of Eastern Market.
Anonymous wrote:What would a nanny do in public with her charges that she wouldn't want reported back to the parents? I know exactly what they would find if looking into my nanny-- someone playing with and engaging my little ones without a second of inattention. Only someone who wasn't doing their job would be worried about this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This was in response to a nanny leaving an 18 month old unattended for more than 20 minutes in which time the baby made it out to the street to wander around alone until a passerby handed the child over to police.
They are changing their entry policy because of this incident. No one from the Playseum staff noticed the 18 month leaving through the open door. The nanny absolutely wrong, but the note says that they have been offering this service for a while so no it is not related to this one incident.
I think the fact that they are taking the incident with the child seriously is good. They should have safe guards in place to ensure that an 18 month can't leave their place unattended. I do have a serious problem with the nanny spying though.
Anonymous wrote:This was in response to a nanny leaving an 18 month old unattended for more than 20 minutes in which time the baby made it out to the street to wander around alone until a passerby handed the child over to police.