Anonymous wrote:Yes $150 is on the high side for the sleeping hours, but I'd say that there are a few factors that indicate that this particular job SHOULD be paying on the higher side. First, the child is young, and even the best sleepers can be a bit hit or miss at that age, especially with a change to the routine (nanny putting him to sleep instead of mom and dad). But the big factor is that OP doesn't have a guest room for the nanny. I know I personally would not get a great nights sleep in any of the options OP described, and a higher rate would go a long way towards making up for that.
Now that's not to say that OP HAS to pay above market or else she's taking advantage of the nanny. I'd suggest first asking the nanny what rate she has in mind, and then comparing it to what others have said here and your own expectations/budget.
Highly skilled professionals usually price their fees according to their past accomplishments. Of course everyone has the option of donating,or discounting, their services, as they see fit.
Anonymous wrote:
It's unbelievable that nannies themselves would undervalue their own services. I suspect that's it's actually parent sock-puppets. Or if any of them are truly nannies, I have to question their skill level.
When I am responsible for a child through the night, I do not sleep as deeply, as I would otherwise. I am on-call to instantly respond to any possible situation or emergency. The piece of mind that parents have when hiring a professional who they can trust, is worth everything.