Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Au Pair Discussion
Reply to "Proposed DC legislation re: domestic workers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]We pay $11k to the agency, $13k to the AP, $1500 for phone and gym membership, $2000 just for her car insurance, $800 (roughly) for gas, $500 for educational credit, $1200 for ticket home for vacation, and about $10,000 (estimated) for additional food, and tickets/housing when we travel with her on working vacations or vacation vacations, which is about 40k annually. She works 44 hours per week (one toddler), with evenings and weekends off. If this legislation went into effect, We would put DD in daycare a few days a week. AP would work fewer but less predictable hours. We would contribute to a phone plan she buys. We would not pay for the gym. We would not provide a dedicated car and would make her pay for personal gas. We would not fly her home. We would not take her on vacation. We would not buy her separate tickets to things while on working vacations. We would also have to withhold tax from her stipend. In other words, we would treat her like a nanny in a nanny share. She would have less money in her pocket. She would have less cultural exchange. Her schedule would be worse. I agree that reforming the AP industry is necessary because we all know stories where families are abusing the system or have one AP for five kids. But this is not the way to do it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics