Reply to Shutdown and furlough

Forum Index » Employer Issues

Reply to "Shutdown and furlough"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You do realize that if all the families who did not meet your bar as wealthy enough to afford a nanny stopped hiring nannies, then there would a huge drop in the number of jobs available to nannies. This would drive your rates into the toilet. Many wealthy families are not irresponsible about money. They aren't going to pay you way above market for kicks and giggles. The supply of nannies would be so large that there would be no issue letting go of a nanny that you didn't need because you are so replaceable. You would be back in the exact same situation and would just be poorer going into it. [/quote]

You aren't getting it. There are tons of women calling themselves nannies, there are not tons of nannies. There are lots of families that think they can afford a nanny, but few who actually can. The result is a split market, one of middle class families paying low to average wages for your run of the mill sitter, and wealthy families paying experienced educated talented women what many here call obscene wages. If the first scenario works for you and your nanny, great! A real nanny has a good enough command of the common language to communicate clearly with you and your child (that eliminates probably 75% of so called nannies right there). She provides more than supervision for her charges, understanding how a child develops, and is able to choose and plan enriching activities. She also cares for her charges every need, and isn't on this board complaining about how every little thing isn't her job, and how uninvolved the parents are, because truthfully the parents with the money to hire a real nanny are by nature not incredibly involved in the minutiae of caring for their child. A real nanny is experienced and qualified enough to be self directed. She doesn't wait around for instructions, because realistically her bosses are not around and little Larla/Aiden need dinner/have outgrown their winter shoes/need to go to the doctor. [/quote]
You are entitled to your opinion just like anyone else, but the peril of your field is that it is entirely free of regulation and credentialing.  In the absence of definition of "nanny", what you call a nanny is just as good a guess as anyone's - all you have to go on is your opinion. There are no barriers to entry, no rules, no standards, no guidelines, no exams, no credentials.  In the absence of formal structures, you are now trying to make the socioeconomic class of the employers into a de facto separator of nannies from non-nannies.  It may be true, or it may not be, no one really knows.  My guess is that rich people are just as entrenched in groupthink as anyone else and are likely to hire nannies who look like them, talk like them and have looked after a little Aiden next door last year. I doubt there is any actual examination of credentials going on there.

Finally, your dig at 75% of "sitters" who allegedly cannot communicate clearly with MBs or children says more about you than them,you know.[/quote]
Indeed. Just ask the recent plethora of speech therapists why their business is now booming.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics