Reply to Question for nannies who do more than "light housekeeping"

Forum Index » General Discussion

Reply to "Question for nannies who do more than "light housekeeping""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

I'm not PP, but I too would not appreciate being asked to do housekeeping. Not because it is housekeeping (I clean my own house after all), but because to me that is [b]not within the scope of my job.[/b] I would be similarly offended if my boss asked me to do their taxes, fix their sink, or take their phone calls; it simply isn't within the scope of the job I signed up for. Now I'm sure some genius will pop in and say that the job is whatever the boss defines it as, and of course it is to an extent, but it isn't good management to drastically change the definition and scope of someone's position and expect to retain good employees. If your boss hired you to do your job, and you agreed to it and are perfectly comfortable doing tasks generally within that realm, I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate them coming to you and saying "our needs have changed a bit and what really I need now is a butt wiper/whatever you used to be."

All of that being said, I have no desire to sit around and stare at your walls for 8 hours a week, and have you resent me for it. I would appreciate my employer coming to me with their concerns and having a discussion about how we can make those hours productive. I think at the very least she can take on kid laundry now, and maybe she has things that she enjoys doing and wouldn't mind taking on for you. I love to cook, and don't see it as work. I would be happy to prepare dinner for the family on mornings I had no children.[/quote]
You are contradicting yourself. You say you won't agree to housekeeping not because it's beneath you, but because it's "not within the scope of your job."

But in the second paragraph, you say you wouldn't mind taking on OTHER things that are also clearly not within the scope of your job, yet still enjoyable or at least not disagreeable to you - like cooking.  So it's not that you object to things outside the scope of your job.  It's that you want to participate in deciding WHAT things outside the scope of your job you will take on.  Some of them - like cleaning - you won't. Others - like cooking - you might.  Don't pretend it's about "not within the scope of my job".  It's about things you like vs. things you don't like.  It's about your personal preference, not the principle of job scope. [/quote]

I'm the poster that you re responding to, and I disagree that it is a contradiction. I think the meaningful difference in the two scenarios tht I described are that one would be the employer asking the employee to step outside the scope of their job, which to me is inappropriate. To unilaterally make significant changes to the definition of the position may be your right as an employer but it is not a good way to keep good employees. The second scenario, in which I would be willing to step out of the scope of the previously defined job, is one in which the employer includes the employee in the conversation. If my employer came to me with their issues, seeking a mutually beneficial and satisfactory solution, I would work with them in that pursuit. This MB would like to make the child free hours productive. Some nannies are comfortable with certain tasks while others are not. Cooking would be the first solution that I would offer after any child related tasks. Yes it is outside the scope of the job but I've volunteered it, not been dictated to, and we would now have a situation that we are both happy with. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics