Reply to Nannies can sue former employers

Forum Index » Employer Issues

Reply to "Nannies can sue former employers"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] It leads one to ask if these errors are made on purpose, specifically by including both the "at will" AND duration of employment term.[/quote]

No, it leads you to ask that. The rest of us are not bothered.[/quote]
You're not concerned with signing contracts with conflicting provisions? Please don't tell us you're a lawyer.[/quote]

No. I'm not suspicious that such errors are made on purpose, which is what you said.[/quote]

I said, "It leads one to ask if these errors are made on purpose." Please check your reading comprehension. Or are you misquoting me on purpose in an attempt to confuse other readers? My statement, as you know, was made in the context of lawyer agency owners who include the conflict of provisions being discussed. Even though we know that some of them are here, none has yet stated that they recommend one provision or the other, but not both.[/quote]

You are making my head spin.

Right, you said "it leads one to ask if these errors are made on purpose."

I disagreed with your implication that anyone other than you was asking that question, and so I said "No, it leads you to ask that."

:shock: [/quote]
There you go again, thinking that everyone else needs to be in agreement with your opinions. Perhaps you should get that spinning little head of yours checked out by a professional. Hope there's a remedy for you. Good luck to you.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics