Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Au Pair Discussion
Reply to "Au Pair Request to Travel"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wrong. Being locked up with your boss and your children’s a totally different thing. Please stop telling yourself what you are doing is ok. Human traffickers say the same thing. Oh, this is better than the girl is treated at home. Shame. You know it. Own it. — host mom of 8 years. [/quote] How is it different as compared to an 18-22 year old live-in nanny who just happens to be a US citizen. It’s not. Yet contracts with exposure clauses are very valid. I’m a live-in nanny in my mid 30s. Almost EVERY live-in contract currently has an exposure clause. Why would APs and HPs not have the same thing? If they do (and it sounds like it was disclosed before matching, so it’s not hinky), why wouldn’t it be enforceable?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
