Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Au Pair Discussion
Reply to "One step closer to a class action against certain agencies - Visit the link today"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm the 11:44 poster and not a troll or roaster. I am someone who benefits greatly from the AP program as a HM and who treats my APs with respect and kindness. What I want is to have the program continue, not be killed. I don't want yet another negative news story about the program in light of the threats made by the President to eliminate it. [/quote] I'm 12:28 above and also a HM who has had the most amazing 5 APs, and who loves the program and is concerned about it's future. Are there bad apples here and there in the AP program who make bad decisions (whether HFs, APs, LCCs and so on)? Yep, I'm sure there are. Just like in any other program or company or life situation. Bring an individual lawsuit if someone was truly hurt of it you really feel you need to (though keep in mind, there are typically 2 sides to every story, plus the truth, which is usually somewhere in the middle and lawsuits are long and expensive and difficult). Or, maybe just take your child care business elsewhere if you feel you were wronged. I should not say this b/c I am a lawyer but not every wrong is "class action" worthy; or front page news; or "call your Congressman, rally the troops" kind of stuff. And just b/c I feel this way does not mean that I am all for throwing my kids to the wolves and I don't care about safe child care. To suggest otherwise is extreme and fear mongering and baseless. It's not a choice between "continuation of the AP program" and "safe child care." It's just not. I also agree that this place is usually pretty negative and it bums me out. But I don't see a problem with calling out the OP here, who refuses to identify him/herself yet wants people here to send their personal information out into cyberland with no assurance of who is on the other end, all while making mysterious and unbelievable claims about Congressional action and front page news. That's suspicious and should be called out as such. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics